A Neural Tension Operator for Curve Subdivision across Constant Curvature Geometries
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Interpolatory subdivision schemes generate smooth curves from piecewise-linear control polygons by repeatedly inserting new vertices. Classical schemes rely on a single global tension parameter and typically require separate formulations in Euclidean, spherical, and hyperbolic geometries. We introduce a shared learned tension predictor that replaces the global parameter with per-edge insertion angles predicted by a single 140K-parameter network. The network takes local intrinsic features and a trainable geometry embedding as input, and the predicted angles drive geometry-specific insertion operators across all three spaces without architectural modification. A constrained sigmoid output head enforces a structural safety bound, guaranteeing that every inserted vertex lies within a valid angular range for any finite weight configuration. Three theoretical results accompany the method: a structural guarantee of tangent-safe insertions; a heuristic motivation for per-edge adaptivity; and a conditional convergence certificate for continuously differentiable limit curves, subject to an explicit Lipschitz constraint verified post hoc. On 240 held-out validation curves, the learned predictor occupies a distinct position on the fidelity--smoothness Pareto frontier, achieving markedly lower bending energy and angular roughness than all fixed-tension and manifold-lift baselines. Riemannian manifold lifts retain a pointwise-fidelity advantage, which this study quantifies directly. On the out-of-distribution ISS orbital ground-track example, bending energy falls by 41% and angular roughness by 68% with only a modest increase in Hausdorff distance, suggesting that the predictor generalises beyond its synthetic training distribution.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 16 of its 36 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 Mar 2026.
Builds on
16 of 36 references.
References · 16
- 2016Layer Normalizationcited by 5,579
- 2016PointNet: Deep Learning on Point Sets for 3D Classification and Segmentationcited by 5,223
- 2015Delving Deep into Rectifiers: Surpassing Human-Level Performance on ImageNet Classificationcited by 3,590
- 2016Gaussian Error Linear Units (GELUs)cited by 3,431
- 2020Fourier Neural Operator for Parametric Partial Differential Equationscited by 2,806
- 2018Dynamic Graph CNN for Learning on Point Cloudscited by 2,220
- 2019DeepONet: Learning nonlinear operators for identifying differential equations based on the universal approximation theorem of operatorscited by 1,965
- 2021Geometric Deep Learning: Grids, Groups, Graphs, Geodesics, and Gaugescited by 1,131
- 2017Poincar'e Embeddings for Learning Hierarchical Representationscited by 674
- 2018Spherical CNNscited by 452
- 2019Hyperbolic Graph Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 400
- 2018Riemannian Adaptive Optimization Methodscited by 187
4 more
- 2020Neural Subdivisioncited by 49
- 2023Poincar'e ResNetcited by 24
- 2025Hyperbolic Deep Learning for Foundation Models: A Surveycited by 20
- 2023Neural Progressive Meshescited by 12
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.