mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

A Neural Tension Operator for Curve Subdivision across Constant Curvature Geometries

arXiv 2603.28937 ↗First posted 30 Mar 2026cs.LGcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Interpolatory subdivision schemes generate smooth curves from piecewise-linear control polygons by repeatedly inserting new vertices. Classical schemes rely on a single global tension parameter and typically require separate formulations in Euclidean, spherical, and hyperbolic geometries. We introduce a shared learned tension predictor that replaces the global parameter with per-edge insertion angles predicted by a single 140K-parameter network. The network takes local intrinsic features and a trainable geometry embedding as input, and the predicted angles drive geometry-specific insertion operators across all three spaces without architectural modification. A constrained sigmoid output head enforces a structural safety bound, guaranteeing that every inserted vertex lies within a valid angular range for any finite weight configuration. Three theoretical results accompany the method: a structural guarantee of tangent-safe insertions; a heuristic motivation for per-edge adaptivity; and a conditional convergence certificate for continuously differentiable limit curves, subject to an explicit Lipschitz constraint verified post hoc. On 240 held-out validation curves, the learned predictor occupies a distinct position on the fidelity--smoothness Pareto frontier, achieving markedly lower bending energy and angular roughness than all fixed-tension and manifold-lift baselines. Riemannian manifold lifts retain a pointwise-fidelity advantage, which this study quantifies directly. On the out-of-distribution ISS orbital ground-track example, bending energy falls by 41% and angular roughness by 68% with only a modest increase in Hausdorff distance, suggesting that the predictor generalises beyond its synthetic training distribution.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 16 of its 36 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 Mar 2026.

Builds on

16 of 36 references.

References · 16

  1. 2016Layer Normalizationcited by 5,579
  2. 2016PointNet: Deep Learning on Point Sets for 3D Classification and Segmentationcited by 5,223
  3. 2015Delving Deep into Rectifiers: Surpassing Human-Level Performance on ImageNet Classificationcited by 3,590
  4. 2016Gaussian Error Linear Units (GELUs)cited by 3,431
  5. 2020Fourier Neural Operator for Parametric Partial Differential Equationscited by 2,806
  6. 2018Dynamic Graph CNN for Learning on Point Cloudscited by 2,220
  7. 2019DeepONet: Learning nonlinear operators for identifying differential equations based on the universal approximation theorem of operatorscited by 1,965
  8. 2021Geometric Deep Learning: Grids, Groups, Graphs, Geodesics, and Gaugescited by 1,131
  9. 2017Poincar'e Embeddings for Learning Hierarchical Representationscited by 674
  10. 2018Spherical CNNscited by 452
  11. 2019Hyperbolic Graph Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 400
  12. 2018Riemannian Adaptive Optimization Methodscited by 187
4 more
  1. 2020Neural Subdivisioncited by 49
  2. 2023Poincar'e ResNetcited by 24
  3. 2025Hyperbolic Deep Learning for Foundation Models: A Surveycited by 20
  4. 2023Neural Progressive Meshescited by 12

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.