mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Post-hoc Self-explanation of CNNs

arXiv 2603.28466 ↗First posted 30 Mar 2026cs.CV stat.MLcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Although standard Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) can be mathematically reinterpreted as Self-Explainable Models (SEMs), their built-in prototypes do not on their own accurately represent the data. Replacing the final linear layer with a k-means-based classifier addresses this limitation without compromising performance. This work introduces a common formalization of k-means-based post-hoc explanations for the classifier, the encoder's final output (B4), and combinations of intermediate feature activations. The latter approach leverages the spatial consistency of convolutional receptive fields to generate concept-based explanation maps, which are supported by gradient-free feature attribution maps. Empirical evaluation with a ResNet34 shows that using shallower, less compressed feature activations, such as those from the last three blocks (B234), results in a trade-off between semantic fidelity and a slight reduction in predictive performance.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 24 of its 34 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 Mar 2026.

Builds on

24 of 34 references.

References · 24

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2014Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognitioncited by 15,267
  3. 2016Densely Connected Convolutional Networkscited by 6,691
  4. 2016Grad-CAM: Visual Explanations from Deep Networks via Gradient-based Localizationcited by 6,690
  5. 2019EfficientNet: Rethinking Model Scaling for Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 6,415
  6. 2014Going Deeper with Convolutionscited by 4,231
  7. 2017Axiomatic Attribution for Deep Networkscited by 3,350
  8. 2015Learning Deep Features for Discriminative Localizationcited by 2,430
  9. 2017Interpretability Beyond Feature Attribution: Quantitative Testing with Concept Activation Vectors (TCAV)cited by 1,309
  10. 2018RISE: Randomized Input Sampling for Explanation of Black-box Modelscited by 825
  11. 2018This Looks Like That: Deep Learning for Interpretable Image Recognitioncited by 731
  12. 2017Network Dissection: Quantifying Interpretability of Deep Visual Representationscited by 703
12 more
  1. 2018Towards Robust Interpretability with Self-Explaining Neural Networkscited by 505
  2. 2022CRAFT: Concept Recursive Activation FacTorization for Explainabilitycited by 177
  3. 2018Net2Vec: Quantifying and Explaining how Concepts are Encoded by Filters in Deep Neural Networkscited by 128
  4. 2020Invertible Concept-based Explanations for CNN Models with Non-negative Concept Activation Vectorscited by 119
  5. 2020A Framework to Learn with Interpretationcited by 23
  6. 2016How to be Fair and Diverse?cited by 18
  7. 2024Concept-Based Explanations in Computer Vision: Where Are We and Where Could We Go?cited by 17
  8. 2025Interpretable Image Classification via Non-parametric Part Prototype Learningcited by 11
  9. 2021Instance-wise or Class-wise? A Tale of Neighbor Shapley for Concept-based Explanationcited by 9
  10. 2023Prototypical Self-Explainable Models Without Re-trainingcited by 6
  11. 2024Pantypes: Diverse Representatives for Self-Explainable Modelscited by 4
  12. 2024Multi-Depth Concept Extraction for Post-Hoc Vision Encoder Explanationcited by 2

Built on by

Not cited yet.