mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Policy-Controlled Generalized Share: A General Framework with a Transformer Instantiation for Strictly Online Switching-Oracle Tracking

arXiv 2603.28198 ↗First posted 30 Mar 2026cs.LG q-fin.STcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Static regret to a single expert is often the wrong target for strictly online prediction under non-stationarity, where the best expert may switch repeatedly over time. We study Policy-Controlled Generalized Share (PCGS), a general strictly online framework in which the generalized-share recursion is fixed while the post-loss update controls are allowed to vary adaptively. Its principal instantiation in this paper is PCGS-TF, which uses a causal Transformer as an update controller: after round t finishes and the loss vector is observed, the Transformer outputs the controls that map w_t to w_{t+1} without altering the already committed decision w_t. Under admissible post-loss update controls, we obtain a pathwise weighted regret guarantee for general time-varying learning rates, and a standard dynamic-regret guarantee against any expert path with at most S switches under the constant-learning-rate specialization. Empirically, on a controlled synthetic suite with exact dynamic-programming switching-oracle evaluation, PCGS-TF attains the lowest mean dynamic regret in all seven non-stationary families, with its advantage increasing for larger expert pools. On a reproduced household-electricity benchmark, PCGS-TF also achieves the lowest normalized dynamic regret for S = 5, 10, and 20.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 18 of its 31 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 Mar 2026.

Builds on

18 of 31 references.

References · 18

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
  2. 2022A Time Series is Worth 64 Words: Long-term Forecasting with Transformerscited by 1,981
  3. 2021Autoformer: Decomposition Transformers with Auto-Correlation for Long-Term Series Forecastingcited by 1,654
  4. 2021Decision Transformer: Reinforcement Learning via Sequence Modelingcited by 1,528
  5. 2022Rethinking the Role of Demonstrations: What Makes In-Context Learning Work?cited by 1,413
  6. 2022Are Transformers Effective for Time Series Forecasting?cited by 1,400
  7. 2022FEDformer: Frequency Enhanced Decomposed Transformer for Long-term Series Forecastingcited by 1,200
  8. 2022TimesNet: Temporal 2D-Variation Modeling for General Time Series Analysiscited by 1,030
  9. 2023iTransformer: Inverted Transformers Are Effective for Time Series Forecastingcited by 906
  10. 2019Introduction to Online Convex Optimizationcited by 793
  11. 2022Transformers learn in-context by gradient descentcited by 714
  12. 2022What Can Transformers Learn In-Context? A Case Study of Simple Function Classescited by 700
6 more
  1. 2022Transformers in Time Series: A Surveycited by 489
  2. 2022Non-stationary Transformers: Exploring the Stationarity in Time Series Forecastingcited by 385
  3. 2017Parameter-free online learning via model selectioncited by 34
  4. 2022Parameter-free Regret in High Probability with Heavy Tailscited by 26
  5. 2024RobustTSF: Towards Theory and Design of Robust Time Series Forecasting with Anomaliescited by 17
  6. 2023Efficient Methods for Non-stationary Online Learningcited by 15

Built on by

Not cited yet.