mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

EnsemJudge: Enhancing Reliability in Chinese LLM-Generated Text Detection through Diverse Model Ensembles

arXiv 2603.27949 ↗First posted 30 Mar 2026cs.CLcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Large Language Models (LLMs) are widely applied across various domains due to their powerful text generation capabilities. While LLM-generated texts often resemble human-written ones, their misuse can lead to significant societal risks. Detecting such texts is an essential technique for mitigating LLM misuse, and many detection methods have shown promising results across different datasets. However, real-world scenarios often involve out-of-domain inputs or adversarial samples, which can affect the performance of detection methods to varying degrees. Furthermore, most existing research has focused on English texts, with limited work addressing Chinese text detection. In this study, we propose EnsemJudge, a robust framework for detecting Chinese LLM-generated text by incorporating tailored strategies and ensemble voting mechanisms. We trained and evaluated our system on a carefully constructed Chinese dataset provided by NLPCC2025 Shared Task 1. Our approach outperformed all baseline methods and achieved first place in the task, demonstrating its effectiveness and reliability in Chinese LLM-generated text detection. Our code is available at https://github.com/johnsonwangzs/MGT-Mini.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 21 of its 28 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 Mar 2026.

Builds on

21 of 28 references.

References · 21

  1. 2021LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Modelscited by 14,084
  2. 2024LlamaFactory: Unified Efficient Fine-Tuning of 100+ Language Modelscited by 1,442
  3. 2024ChatGLM: A Family of Large Language Models from GLM-130B to GLM-4 All Toolscited by 1,096
  4. 2023DetectGPT: Zero-Shot Machine-Generated Text Detection using Probability Curvaturecited by 705
  5. 2019Release Strategies and the Social Impacts of Language Modelscited by 505
  6. 2019GLTR: Statistical Detection and Visualization of Generated Textcited by 490
  7. 2023How Close is ChatGPT to Human Experts? Comparison Corpus, Evaluation, and Detectioncited by 472
  8. 2020Multilingual Translation with Extensible Multilingual Pretraining and Finetuningcited by 287
  9. 2023Fast-DetectGPT: Efficient Zero-Shot Detection of Machine-Generated Text via Conditional Probability Curvaturecited by 278
  10. 2020Revisiting Pre-Trained Models for Chinese Natural Language Processingcited by 262
  11. 2019Automatic Detection of Generated Text is Easiest when Humans are Fooledcited by 260
  12. 2024Spotting LLMs With Binoculars: Zero-Shot Detection of Machine-Generated Textcited by 255
9 more
  1. 2023RADAR: Robust AI-Text Detection via Adversarial Learningcited by 187
  2. 2019Unifying Human and Statistical Evaluation for Natural Language Generationcited by 127
  3. 2023DNA-GPT: Divergent N-Gram Analysis for Training-Free Detection of GPT-Generated Textcited by 127
  4. 2023A Survey on LLM-Generated Text Detection: Necessity, Methods, and Future Directionscited by 101
  5. 2023On the Possibilities of AI-Generated Text Detectioncited by 88
  6. 2024DeTeCtive: Detecting AI-generated Text via Multi-Level Contrastive Learningcited by 52
  7. 2024DetectRL: Benchmarking LLM-Generated Text Detection in Real-World Scenarioscited by 37
  8. 2024Training-free LLM-generated Text Detection by Mining Token Probability Sequencescited by 33
  9. 2023DPIC: Decoupling Prompt and Intrinsic Characteristics for LLM Generated Text Detectioncited by 18

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.