mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Supporting Reflection and Forward-Looking Reasoning With Data-Driven Questions

arXiv 2603.27318 ↗First posted 28 Mar 2026cs.HCcited by 0

On the map: LLM reasoning → Reasoning benchmarks and evaluation

Abstract (arXiv)

Many generative AI systems as well as decision-support systems (DSSs) provide operators with predictions or recommendations. Various studies show, however, that people can mistakenly adopt the erroneous results presented by those systems. Hence, it is crucial to promote critical thinking and reflection during interaction. One approach we are focusing on involves encouraging reflection during machine-assisted decision-making by presenting decision-makers with data-driven questions. In this short paper, we provide a brief overview of our work in that regard, namely: 1) the development of a question taxonomy, 2) the development of a prototype in the medical domain and the feedback received from clinicians, 3) a method for generating questions using a large language model, and 4) a proposed scale for measuring cognitive engagement in human-AI decision-making. In doing so, we contribute to the discussion about the design, development, and evaluation of tools for thought, i.e., AI systems that provoke critical thinking and enable novel ways of sense-making.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Reasoning benchmarks and evaluation, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 1 of its 25 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 Mar 2026.

Builds on

1 of 25 references.

References · 1

  1. 2026Who's in Charge? Disempowerment Patterns in Real-World LLM Usagecited by 15

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Automated Benchmark Generation from Domain Guidelines Informed by Bloom's Taxonomy
  2. 2025Resurrecting Socrates in the Age of AI: A Study Protocol for Evaluating a Socratic Tutor to Support Research Question Development in Higher Education
  3. 2024The Future of Learning in the Age of Generative AI: Automated Question Generation and Assessment with Large Language Models
  4. 2026Reimagining Assessment in the Age of Generative AI: Lessons from Open-Book Exams with ChatGPT ↗
  5. 2025Reflection Before Action: Designing a Framework for Quantifying Thought Patterns for Increased Self-awareness in Personal Decision Making
  6. 2025First Try Matters: Revisiting the Role of Reflection in Reasoning Models
  7. 2025Designing AI Systems that Augment Human Performed vs. Demonstrated Critical Thinking
  8. 2024Learn Beyond The Answer: Training Language Models with Reflection for Mathematical Reasoning