Robust Global-Local Behavior Arbitration via Continuous Command Fusion Under LiDAR Errors
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Modular autonomous driving systems must coordinate global progress objectives with local safety-driven reactions under imperfect sensing and strict real-time constraints. This paper presents a ROS2-native arbitration module that continuously fuses the outputs of two unchanged and interpretable controllers: a global reference-tracking controller based on Pure Pursuit and a reactive LiDAR-based Gap Follow controller. At each control step, both controllers propose Ackermann commands, and a PPO-trained policy predicts a continuous gate from a compact feature observation to produce a single fused drive command, augmented with practical safety checks. For comparison under identical ROS topic inputs and control rate, we implement a lightweight sampling-based predictive baseline. Robustness is evaluated using a ROS2 impairment protocol that injects LiDAR noise, delay, and dropout, and additionally sweeps forward-cone false short-range outliers. In a repeatable close-proximity passing scenario, we report safe success and failure rates together with per-step end-to-end controller runtime as sensing stress increases. The study is intended as a command-level robustness evaluation in a modular ROS2 setting, not as a replacement for planning-level interaction reasoning.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 9 of its 20 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 Mar 2026.
Builds on
9 of 20 references.
References · 9
- 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 15,215
- 2015High-Dimensional Continuous Control Using Generalized Advantage Estimationcited by 2,026
- 2025Mixture of Experts (MoE): A Big Data Perspectivecited by 18
- 2023Lateral control for autonomous vehicles: A comparative evaluationcited by 4
- 2023Assessing the Robustness of LiDAR, Radar and Depth Cameras Against Ill-Reflecting Surfaces in Autonomous Vehicles: An Experimental Studycited by 3
- 2022Hierarchical Control for Head-to-Head Autonomous Racingcited by 2
- 2025Testing the Fault-Tolerance of Multi-Sensor Fusion Perception in Autonomous Driving Systemscited by 2
- 2025Advancing Autonomous Racing: A Comprehensive Survey of the RoboRacer (F1TENTH) Platformcited by 2
- 2022Factor Graph-Based Planning as Inference for Autonomous Vehicle Racingcited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.