mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Are LLMs Good For Quantum Software, Architecture, and System Design?

arXiv 2603.26904 ↗First posted 27 Mar 2026quant-ph cs.AIcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Quantum computers promise massive computational speedup for problems in many critical domains, such as physics, chemistry, cryptanalysis, healthcare, etc. However, despite decades of research, they remain far from entering an era of utility. The lack of mature software, architecture, and systems solutions capable of translating quantum-mechanical properties of algorithms into physical state transformations on qubit devices remains a key factor underlying the slow pace of technological progress. The problem worsens due to significant reliance on domain-specific expertise, especially for software developers, computer architects, and systems engineers. To address these limitations and accelerate large-scale high-performance quantum system design, we ask: Can large language models (LLMs) help with solving quantum software, architecture, and systems problems? In this work, we present a case study assessing the performance of LLMs on quantum system reasoning tasks. We evaluate nine frontier LLMs and compare their performance to graduate UT Austin students on a set of quantum computing problems. Finally, we recommend several directions along which research and engineering development efforts must be pursued.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 3 of its 11 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 27 Mar 2026.

Builds on

3 of 11 references.

References · 3

  1. 2024Promatch: Extending the Reach of Real-Time Quantum Error Correction with Adaptive Predecodingcited by 1
  2. 2024Flag Proxy Networks: Tackling the Architectural, Scheduling, and Decoding Obstacles of Quantum LDPC codescited by 1
  3. 2025Synchronization for Fault-Tolerant Quantum Computerscited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Quantum-Audit: Evaluating the Reasoning Limits of LLMs on Quantum Computing
  2. 2025Circuit Partitioning Using Large Language Models for Quantum Compilation and Simulations
  3. 2026Qiskit QuantumKatas: Adapting Microsoft's Quantum Computing exercises for LLM evaluation
  4. 2025LLM-Powered Quantum Code Transpilation
  5. 2025Agent-Q: Fine-Tuning Large Language Models for Quantum Circuit Generation and Optimization
  6. 2026Beyond Rules: LLM-Powered Linting for Quantum Programs ↗
  7. 2026Fine-Tuning Large Language Models for Quantum Reasoning
  8. 2025Large Language Model Scaling Laws for Neural Quantum States in Quantum Chemistry