mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Confidence Matters: Uncertainty Quantification and Precision Assessment of Deep Learning-based CMR Biomarker Estimates Using Scan-rescan Data

arXiv 2603.26789 ↗First posted 25 Mar 2026cs.CVcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The performance of deep learning (DL) methods for the analysis of cine cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) is typically assessed in terms of accuracy, overlooking precision. In this work, uncertainty estimation techniques, namely deep ensemble, test-time augmentation, and Monte Carlo dropout, are applied to a state-of-the-art DL pipeline for cardiac functional biomarker estimation, and new distribution-based metrics are proposed for the assessment of biomarker precision. The model achieved high accuracy (average Dice 87%) and point estimate precision on two external validation scan-rescan CMR datasets. However, distribution-based metrics showed that the overlap between scan/rescan confidence intervals was >50% in less than 45% of the cases. Statistical similarity tests between scan and rescan biomarkers also resulted in significant differences for over 65% of the cases. We conclude that, while point estimate metrics might suggest good performance, distributional analyses reveal lower precision, highlighting the need to use more representative metrics to assess scan-rescan agreement.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 1 of its 15 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 Mar 2026.

Builds on

1 of 15 references.

References · 1

  1. 2022Trustworthy clinical AI solutions: a unified review of uncertainty quantification in deep learning models for medical image analysiscited by 63

Built on by

Not cited yet.