mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Image-Domain Poisson-Perturbation Robustness of NCCT Slice Classification

arXiv 2603.26764 ↗First posted 24 Mar 2026cs.CVcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Image-domain Poisson perturbation may alter normalized NCCT appearance and downstream models. We evaluated classification of ischemic core/penumbra-bearing non-contrast CT (NCCT) slices under five simulated settings. The source cohort was CPAISD (112 hyperacute ischemic stroke patients); the test partition contained 10 patients and 809 slices. First, a fixed-checkpoint audit compared direct ResNet-18 classification (P1) with residual U-Net denoising followed by the classifier (P2). P1 average precision (AP) ranged from 0.694 to 0.901, whereas P2 AP ranged from 0.509 to 0.797 (substantially lower at settings 10-40). The fixed 0.5 threshold had 0-12.8% sensitivity for P1 and 0% for P2. Second, a prospectively locked de novo experiment compared direct noisy classification (DNC), joint denoising-classification (JDC-0), and the same joint model with privileged training-only lesion-boundary supervision (JDC-B). Across-setting mean AP was 0.861 +/- 0.028 for DNC, 0.840 +/- 0.038 for JDC-0, and 0.856 +/- 0.031 for JDC-B. Hierarchical paired-bootstrap differences were -0.021 (95% CI -0.063 to 0.019) for JDC-0 minus DNC, 0.016 (-0.019 to 0.054) for JDC-B minus JDC-0, and -0.005 (-0.041 to 0.026) for JDC-B minus DNC; none excluded zero. A frozen stress test on the 52-patient AISD partition also showed limited transportability. Thus, ordinary joint training did not demonstrate a classification benefit, and the boundary term recovered part of its point-estimate loss without a statistically supported advantage. Image fidelity, ranking, calibration, and clinical utility must be evaluated separately. This study does not validate acquired low-dose, portable, or cone-beam CT, nor patient-level stroke diagnosis.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 10 of its 20 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 Mar 2026.

Builds on

10 of 20 references.

References · 10

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
  2. 2015U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentationcited by 19,713
  3. 2016Grad-CAM: Visual Explanations from Deep Networks via Gradient-based Localizationcited by 6,733
  4. 2016Densely Connected Convolutional Networkscited by 6,720
  5. 2021SwinIR: Image Restoration Using Swin Transformercited by 1,887
  6. 2021Restormer: Efficient Transformer for High-Resolution Image Restorationcited by 1,627
  7. 2021TransUNet: Transformers Make Strong Encoders for Medical Image Segmentationcited by 1,558
  8. 2016Beyond a Gaussian Denoiser: Residual Learning of Deep CNN for Image Denoisingcited by 1,358
  9. 2021Symmetry-Enhanced Attention Network for Acute Ischemic Infarct Segmentation with Non-Contrast CT Imagescited by 17
  10. 2021Task-Oriented Low-Dose CT Image Denoisingcited by 11

Built on by

Not cited yet.