mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Curvature-aware Expected Free Energy as an Acquisition Function for Bayesian Optimization

arXiv 2603.26339 ↗First posted 27 Mar 2026cs.LG cs.RO cs.SYcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We propose an Expected Free Energy-based acquisition function for Bayesian optimization to solve the joint learning and optimization problem, i.e., optimize and learn the underlying function simultaneously. We show that, under specific assumptions, Expected Free Energy reduces to Upper Confidence Bound, Lower Confidence Bound, and Expected Information Gain. We prove that Expected Free Energy has unbiased convergence guarantees for concave functions. Using the results from these derivations, we introduce a curvature-aware update law for Expected Free Energy and show its proof of concept using a system identification problem on a Van der Pol oscillator. On a two-dimensional benchmark with an oscillatory landscape, our adaptive Expected Free Energy acquisition achieves competitive performance in both regret and mean squared error, unlike the typical acquisition functions that perform well in only one metric.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 7 of its 15 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 27 Mar 2026.

Builds on

7 of 15 references.

References · 7

  1. 2018A Tutorial on Bayesian Optimizationcited by 734
  2. 2017Bayesian Optimization with Gradientscited by 59
  3. 2016Time-Varying Gaussian Process Bandit Optimizationcited by 50
  4. 2020Whence the Expected Free Energy?cited by 40
  5. 2017Exploiting gradients and Hessians in Bayesian optimization and Bayesian quadraturecited by 9
  6. 2024Learning-based Methods for Adaptive Informative Path Planningcited by 9
  7. 2020Performance-Driven Cascade Controller Tuning with Bayesian Optimizationcited by 7

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.