CALRK-Bench: Evaluating Context-Aware Legal Reasoning in Korean Law
On the map: LLM reasoning → Reasoning for agents, planning and code
Abstract (arXiv)
Legal reasoning requires not only the application of legal rules but also an understanding of the context in which those rules operate. However, existing legal benchmarks primarily evaluate rule application under the assumption of fixed norms, and thus fail to capture situations where legal judgments shift or where multiple norms interact. In this work, we propose CALRK-Bench, a context-aware legal reasoning benchmark based on the legal system in Korean. CALRK-Bench evaluates whether models can identify the temporal validity of legal norms, determine whether sufficient legal information is available for a given case, and understand the reasons behind shifts in legal judgments. The dataset is constructed from legal precedents and legal consultation records, and is validated by legal experts. Experimental results show that even recent large language models consistently exhibit low performance on these three tasks. CALRK-Bench provides a new stress test for evaluating context-aware legal reasoning rather than simple memorization of legal knowledge. Our code is available at https://github.com/jhCOR/CALRKBench.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Reasoning for agents, planning and code, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 9 of its 26 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 27 Mar 2026.
Builds on
9 of 26 references.
Closest ancestors · 1
Same direction, newest first
Other references · 8
- 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,132
- 2020Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understandingcited by 7,768
- 2025OpenAI GPT-5 System Cardcited by 910
- 2024LegalBench-RAG: A Benchmark for Retrieval-Augmented Generation in the Legal Domaincited by 113
- 2024Studying Large Language Model Behaviors Under Context-Memory Conflicts With Real Documentscited by 27
- 2024Understanding the Interplay between Parametric and Contextual Knowledge for Large Language Modelscited by 14
- 2025LexTime: A Benchmark for Temporal Ordering of Legal Eventscited by 9
- 2025Do LLMs Truly Understand When a Precedent Is Overruled?cited by 6
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025Korean Canonical Legal Benchmark: Toward Knowledge-Independent Evaluation of LLMs' Legal Reasoning Capabilities
- 2024Developing a Pragmatic Benchmark for Assessing Korean Legal Language Understanding in Large Language Models
- 2023LegalBench: A Collaboratively Built Benchmark for Measuring Legal Reasoning in Large Language Models
- 2025Evaluating Test-Time Scaling LLMs for Legal Reasoning: OpenAI o1, DeepSeek-R1, and Beyond
- 2025Capturing Legal Reasoning Paths from Facts to Law in Court Judgments using Knowledge Graphs
- 2026OpenExempt: A Diagnostic Benchmark for Legal Reasoning and a Framework for Creating Custom Benchmarks on Demand
- 2026When Do LLMs Apply the Wrong Law? Diagnosing LLM Failures in Temporal Legal Reasoning
- 2026Multi-Legal-Bench: Evaluating LLMs on Legal Reasoning Across Jurisdictions, Languages, and Legal Traditions