mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

AcTTA: Rethinking Test-Time Adaptation via Dynamic Activation

arXiv 2603.26096 ↗First posted 27 Mar 2026cs.LG cs.CVcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Test-time adaptation (TTA) aims to mitigate performance degradation under distribution shifts by updating model parameters during inference. Existing approaches have primarily framed adaptation around affine modulation, focusing on recalibrating normalization layers. This perspective, while effective, overlooks another influential component in representation dynamics: the activation function. We revisit this overlooked space and propose AcTTA, an activation-aware framework that reinterprets conventional activation functions from a learnable perspective and updates them adaptively at test time. AcTTA reformulates conventional activation functions (e.g., ReLU, GELU) into parameterized forms that shift their response threshold and modulate gradient sensitivity, enabling the network to adjust activation behavior under domain shifts. This functional reparameterization enables continuous adjustment of activation behavior without modifying network weights or requiring source data. Despite its simplicity, AcTTA achieves robust and stable adaptation across diverse corruptions. Across CIFAR10-C, CIFAR100-C, and ImageNet-C, AcTTA consistently surpasses normalization-based TTA methods. Our findings highlight activation adaptation as a compact and effective route toward domain-shift-robust test-time learning, broadening the prevailing affine-centric view of adaptation.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 21 of its 30 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 27 Mar 2026.

Builds on

21 of 30 references.

References · 21

  1. 2015Delving Deep into Rectifiers: Surpassing Human-Level Performance on ImageNet Classificationcited by 3,590
  2. 2016Gaussian Error Linear Units (GELUs)cited by 3,431
  3. 2019Benchmarking Neural Network Robustness to Common Corruptions and Perturbationscited by 2,857
  4. 2020The Many Faces of Robustness: A Critical Analysis of Out-of-Distribution Generalizationcited by 1,842
  5. 2020WILDS: A Benchmark of in-the-Wild Distribution Shiftscited by 1,366
  6. 2015Fast and Accurate Deep Network Learning by Exponential Linear Units (ELUs)cited by 1,061
  7. 2022Continual Test-Time Domain Adaptationcited by 520
  8. 2022Efficient Test-Time Model Adaptation without Forgettingcited by 467
  9. 2023Towards Stable Test-Time Adaptation in Dynamic Wild Worldcited by 409
  10. 2021MEMO: Test Time Robustness via Adaptation and Augmentationcited by 376
  11. 2023A Comprehensive Survey on Test-Time Adaptation under Distribution Shiftscited by 353
  12. 2013Maxout Networkscited by 186
9 more
  1. 2024Entropy is not Enough for Test-Time Adaptation: From the Perspective of Disentangled Factorscited by 106
  2. 2020A survey on modern trainable activation functionscited by 89
  3. 2019Pad'e Activation Units: End-to-end Learning of Flexible Activation Functions in Deep Networkscited by 65
  4. 2023Universal Test-time Adaptation through Weight Ensembling, Diversity Weighting, and Prior Correctioncited by 65
  5. 2014Learning Activation Functions to Improve Deep Neural Networkscited by 62
  6. 2023In Search of Lost Online Test-time Adaptation: A Surveycited by 43
  7. 2020Activate or Not: Learning Customized Activationcited by 21
  8. 2021Shifting Transformation Learning for Out-of-Distribution Detectioncited by 6
  9. 2025Buffer layers for Test-Time Adaptationcited by 5

Built on by

Not cited yet.