Pure and physics-guided deep learning approaches for spatio-temporal groundwater level prediction
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Groundwater represents a key element of the water cycle, yet it exhibits complex and context-dependent relationships that make its modeling challenging. Theory-based models have been the cornerstone of scientific understanding. However, their computational cost, simplifying assumptions, and calibration requirements limit their use. In recent years, data-driven models have emerged as powerful alternatives. In particular, deep learning has proven to be a promising approach for its design flexibility and ability to learn complex relationships directly from the data without requiring extensive domain information. We proposed an attention-based pure deep learning model, named STAINet, to predict weekly groundwater levels in Piedmont (Italy), leveraging both irregular groundwater time series and weather image sequences. To enhance the model's trustworthiness and generalization ability, we merged the theory and data-driven approaches by considering physics-guided strategies to inject the groundwater flow equation into the model. Firstly, we restructured the tail of the architecture to predict the three terms of the governing equation, named the autoregressive, diffusion, and residual components - we thus obtained the PSTAINet-IB. Then, we further injected physics priors by adding loss terms related to the estimated equation components, obtaining the PSTAINet-ILB model. Lastly, we developed the PSTAINet-ILRB by imposing a loss term specific to the residual component, which forces the groundwater recharge to occur within the groundwater body recharge zone, which is identified by domain experts. The models were evaluated both by feeding true lagged values as input and by iterating their own predictions (rollouts) over the whole test set. The PSTAINet-ILB model performed the best, achieving remarkable test performance, and generating equation components in line with domain experts' expectations.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 15 of its 59 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 Mar 2026.
Builds on
15 of 59 references.
References · 15
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
- 2020A Simple Framework for Contrastive Learning of Visual Representationscited by 11,979
- 2018Neural Ordinary Differential Equationscited by 3,733
- 2021Switch Transformers: Scaling to Trillion Parameter Models with Simple and Efficient Sparsitycited by 3,014
- 2017FiLM: Visual Reasoning with a General Conditioning Layercited by 2,286
- 2021Autoformer: Decomposition Transformers with Auto-Correlation for Long-Term Series Forecastingcited by 1,654
- 2021ViViT: A Video Vision Transformercited by 1,610
- 2018Graph Neural Networks: A Review of Methods and Applicationscited by 1,571
- 2016Theory-guided Data Science: A New Paradigm for Scientific Discovery from Datacited by 169
- 2017Deep Learning for Physical Processes: Incorporating Prior Scientific Knowledgecited by 95
- 2017On orthogonality and learning recurrent networks with long term dependenciescited by 82
- 2023Deep Learning for Day Forecasts from Sparse Observationscited by 70
3 more
- 2019Physically Interpretable Neural Networks for the Geosciences: Applications to Earth System Variabilitycited by 43
- 2021Physics-Guided Deep Learning for Dynamical Systems: A Surveycited by 43
- 2020From calibration to parameter learning: Harnessing the scaling effects of big data in geoscientific modelingcited by 26
Built on by
Not cited yet.