Training the Knowledge Base through Evidence Distillation and Write-Back Enrichment
On the map: Retrieval-augmented generation → RAG pipeline design and evaluation
Abstract (arXiv)
The knowledge base in a retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) system is typically assembled once and never revised, even though the facts a query requires are often fragmented across documents and buried in irrelevant content. We argue that the knowledge base should be treated as a trainable component and propose WriteBack-RAG, a framework that uses labeled examples to identify where retrieval succeeds, isolate the relevant documents, and distill them into compact knowledge units that are indexed alongside the original corpus. Because the method modifies only the corpus, it can be applied once as an offline preprocessing step and combined with any RAG pipeline. Across four RAG methods, six benchmarks, and two LLM backbones, WriteBack-RAG improves every evaluated setting, with gains averaging +2.14%. Cross-method transfer experiments further show that the distilled knowledge benefits RAG pipelines other than the one used to produce it, confirming that the improvement resides in the corpus itself.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in RAG pipeline design and evaluation, one of 15 directions in Retrieval-augmented generation. Builds on 18 of its 40 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 Mar 2026.
Builds on
18 of 40 references.
Closest ancestors · 1
Same direction, newest first
Other references · 17
- 2016SQuAD: 100,000+ Questions for Machine Comprehension of Textcited by 4,148
- 2018HotpotQA: A Dataset for Diverse, Explainable Multi-hop Question Answeringcited by 3,754
- 2022Locating and Editing Factual Associations in GPTcited by 2,691
- 2019BoolQ: Exploring the Surprising Difficulty of Natural Yes/No Questionscited by 2,183
- 2020REALM: Retrieval-Augmented Language Model Pre-Trainingcited by 2,141
- 2023Self-RAG: Learning to Retrieve, Generate, and Critique through Self-Reflectioncited by 1,839
- 2018FEVER: a large-scale dataset for Fact Extraction and VERificationcited by 1,375
- 2021Improving language models by retrieving from trillions of tokenscited by 1,293
- 2022Text Embeddings by Weakly-Supervised Contrastive Pre-trainingcited by 1,253
- 2022Mass-Editing Memory in a Transformercited by 1,001
- 2022Atlas: Few-shot Learning with Retrieval Augmented Language Modelscited by 952
- 2023REPLUG: Retrieval-Augmented Black-Box Language Modelscited by 792
5 more
- 2022Precise Zero-Shot Dense Retrieval without Relevance Labelscited by 517
- 2017Zero-Shot Relation Extraction via Reading Comprehensioncited by 426
- 2022Generate rather than Retrieve: Large Language Models are Strong Context Generatorscited by 298
- 2024Adaptive Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Conversational Systemscited by 22
- 2015Knowledge-Based Trust: Estimating the Trustworthiness of Web Sourcescited by 21
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025A Survey on Knowledge-Oriented Retrieval-Augmented Generation
- 2025KG-Infused RAG: Augmenting Corpus-Based RAG with External Knowledge Graphs
- 2025Test-time Corpus Feedback: From Retrieval to RAG
- 2025Dynamic and Parametric Retrieval-Augmented Generation
- 2024Multi-Source Knowledge Pruning for Retrieval-Augmented Generation: A Benchmark and Empirical Study
- 2024Do You Know What You Are Talking About? Characterizing Query-Knowledge Relevance For Reliable Retrieval Augmented Generation
- 2025RAG+: Enhancing Retrieval-Augmented Generation with Application-Aware Reasoning
- 2024Enhancing Retrieval and Managing Retrieval: A Four-Module Synergy for Improved Quality and Efficiency in RAG Systems