mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

No Hard Negatives Required: Concept Centric Learning Leads to Compositionality without Degrading Zero-shot Capabilities of Contrastive Models

arXiv 2603.25722 ↗First posted 26 Mar 2026cs.CV cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Contrastive vision-language (V&L) models remain a popular choice for various applications. However, several limitations have emerged, most notably the limited ability of V&L models to learn compositional representations. Prior methods often addressed this limitation by generating custom training data to obtain hard negative samples. Hard negatives have been shown to improve performance on compositionality tasks, but are often specific to a single benchmark, do not generalize, and can cause substantial degradation of basic V&L capabilities such as zero-shot or retrieval performance, rendering them impractical. In this work we follow a different approach. We identify two root causes that limit compositionality performance of V&Ls: 1) Long training captions do not require a compositional representation; and 2) The final global pooling in the text and image encoders lead to a complete loss of the necessary information to learn binding in the first place. As a remedy, we propose two simple solutions: 1) We obtain short concept centric caption parts using standard NLP software and align those with the image; and 2) We introduce a parameter-free cross-modal attention-pooling to obtain concept centric visual embeddings from the image encoder. With these two changes and simple auxiliary contrastive losses, we obtain SOTA performance on standard compositionality benchmarks, while maintaining or improving strong zero-shot and retrieval capabilities. This is achieved without increasing inference cost. We release the code for this work at https://github.com/saic-fi/concept_centric_clip.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 29 of its 38 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 Mar 2026.

Builds on

29 of 38 references.

References · 29

  1. 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,744
  2. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 30,186
  3. 2023Improved Baselines with Visual Instruction Tuningcited by 4,418
  4. 2022BLIP: Bootstrapping Language-Image Pre-training for Unified Vision-Language Understanding and Generationcited by 4,322
  5. 2023Sigmoid Loss for Language Image Pre-Trainingcited by 3,109
  6. 2025SigLIP 2: Multilingual Vision-Language Encoders with Improved Semantic Understanding, Localization, and Dense Featurescited by 1,188
  7. 2021FLAVA: A Foundational Language And Vision Alignment Modelcited by 649
  8. 2022When and why vision-language models behave like bags-of-words, and what to do about it?cited by 610
  9. 2024Evaluating Text-to-Visual Generation with Image-to-Text Generationcited by 474
  10. 2023SugarCrepe: Fixing Hackable Benchmarks for Vision-Language Compositionalitycited by 243
  11. 2024DOCCI: Descriptions of Connected and Contrasting Imagescited by 132
  12. 2022Does CLIP Bind Concepts? Probing Compositionality in Large Image Modelscited by 102
17 more
  1. 2025FG-CLIP: Fine-Grained Visual and Textual Alignmentcited by 81
  2. 2023An Inverse Scaling Law for CLIP Trainingcited by 77
  3. 2023Dense and Aligned Captions (DAC) Promote Compositional Reasoning in VL Modelscited by 72
  4. 2024DreamLIP: Language-Image Pre-training with Long Captionscited by 72
  5. 2022Teaching Structured Vision&Language Concepts to Vision&Language Modelscited by 71
  6. 2024TripletCLIP: Improving Compositional Reasoning of CLIP via Synthetic Vision-Language Negativescited by 58
  7. 2024FLAIR: VLM with Fine-grained Language-informed Image Representationscited by 48
  8. 2024Learn "No" to Say "Yes" Better: Improving Vision-Language Models via Negationscited by 46
  9. 2024Modeling Caption Diversity in Contrastive Vision-Language Pretrainingcited by 42
  10. 2024SUGARCREPE++ Dataset: Vision-Language Model Sensitivity to Semantic and Lexical Alterationscited by 42
  11. 2023Contrasting Intra-Modal and Ranking Cross-Modal Hard Negatives to Enhance Visio-Linguistic Compositional Understandingcited by 41
  12. 2023Revisiting Multimodal Representation in Contrastive Learning: From Patch and Token Embeddings to Finite Discrete Tokenscited by 35
  13. 2022When are Lemons Purple? The Concept Association Bias of Vision-Language Modelscited by 23
  14. 2024CLIPS: An Enhanced CLIP Framework for Learning with Synthetic Captionscited by 22
  15. 2025Object-centric Binding in Contrastive Language-Image Pretrainingcited by 12
  16. 2025Enhancing Vision-Language Compositional Understanding with Multimodal Synthetic Datacited by 12
  17. 2025Common Data Properties Limit Object-Attribute Binding in CLIPcited by 4

Built on by

Not cited yet.