mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Response-Aware Risk-Constrained Control Barrier Function With Application to Vehicles

arXiv 2603.24598 ↗First posted 13 Mar 2026math.OC cs.LG cs.SYcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

This paper proposes a unified control framework based on Response-Aware Risk-Constrained Control Barrier Function for dynamic safety boundary control of vehicles. Addressing the problem of physical model parameter mismatch, the framework constructs an uncertainty propagation model that fuses nominal dynamics priors with direct vehicle body responses. Utilizing simplified single-track dynamics to provide a baseline direction for control gradients and covering model deviations through statistical analysis of body response signals, the framework eliminates the dependence on accurate online estimation of road surface adhesion coefficients. By introducing Conditional Value at Risk (CVaR) theory, the framework reformulates traditional deterministic safety constraints into probabilistic constraints on the tail risk of barrier function derivatives. Combined with a Bayesian online learning mechanism based on inverse Wishart priors, it identifies environmental noise covariance in real-time, adaptively tuning safety margins to reduce performance loss under prior parameter mismatch. Finally, based on Control Lyapunov Function (CLF), a unified Second-Order Cone Programming (SOCP) controller is constructed. Theoretical analysis establishes convergence of Sequential Convex Programming to local Karush-Kuhn-Tucker points and provides per-step probabilistic safety bounds. High-fidelity dynamics simulations demonstrate that under extreme conditions, the method not only eliminates the output divergence phenomenon of traditional methods but also achieves Pareto improvement in both safety and tracking performance. For the chosen risk level, the per-step safety violation probability is theoretically bounded by approximately 2%, validated through high-fidelity simulations showing zero boundary violations across all tested scenarios.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 11 of its 27 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 Mar 2026.

Builds on

11 of 27 references.

References · 11

  1. 2019End-to-End Safe Reinforcement Learning through Barrier Functions for Safety-Critical Continuous Control Taskscited by 256
  2. 2019Learning for Safety-Critical Control with Control Barrier Functionscited by 66
  3. 2020Safety-Critical Model Predictive Control with Discrete-Time Control Barrier Functioncited by 42
  4. 2020Multi-Layered Safety for Legged Robots via Control Barrier Functions and Model Predictive Controlcited by 20
  5. 2020Control Barrier Functions for Stochastic Systemscited by 14
  6. 2020Training Neural Network Controllers Using Control Barrier Functions in the Presence of Disturbancescited by 9
  7. 2021High-order Barrier Functions: Robustness, Safety and Performance-Critical Controlcited by 7
  8. 2024Robust Control Barrier Functions using Uncertainty Estimation with Application to Mobile Robotscited by 6
  9. 2022Safe Control for Nonlinear Systems with Stochastic Uncertainty via Risk Control Barrier Functionscited by 5
  10. 2018Decentralized Optimal Merging Control for Connected and Automated Vehiclescited by 3
  11. 2022Disturbance Observers for Robust Safety-critical Control with Control Barrier Functionscited by 2

Built on by

Not cited yet.