mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

ReqFusion: A Multi-Provider Framework for Automated PEGS Analysis Across Software Domains

arXiv 2603.23482 ↗First posted 24 Mar 2026cs.SE cs.AIcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Requirements engineering is a vital, yet labor-intensive, stage in the software development process. This article introduces ReqFusion: an AI-enhanced system that automates the extraction, classification, and analysis of software requirements utilizing multiple Large Language Model (LLM) providers. The architecture of ReqFusion integrates OpenAI GPT, Anthropic Claude, and Groq models to extract functional and non-functional requirements from various documentation formats (PDF, DOCX, and PPTX) in academic, industrial, and tender proposal contexts. The system uses a domain-independent extraction method and generates requirements following the Project, Environment, Goal, and System (PEGS) approach introduced by Bertrand Meyer. The main idea is that, because the PEGS format is detailed, LLMs have more information and cues about the requirements, producing better results than a simple generic request. An ablation study confirms this hypothesis: PEGS-guided prompting achieves an F1 score of 0.88, compared to 0.71 for generic prompting under the same multi-provider configuration. The evaluation used 18 real-world documents to generate 226 requirements through automated classification, with 54.9% functional and 45.1% nonfunctional across academic, business, and technical domains. An extended evaluation on five projects with 1,050 requirements demonstrated significant improvements in extraction accuracy and a 78% reduction in analysis time compared to manual methods. The multi-provider architecture enhances reliability through model consensus and fallback mechanisms, while the PEGS-based approach ensures comprehensive coverage of all requirement categories.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 11 of its 32 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 Mar 2026.

Builds on

11 of 32 references.

References · 11

  1. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
  2. 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,132
  3. 2023Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Modelscited by 12,865
  4. 2022Self-Consistency Improves Chain of Thought Reasoning in Language Modelscited by 5,601
  5. 2022Survey of Hallucination in Natural Language Generationcited by 2,056
  6. 2023A Survey on Hallucination in Large Language Models: Principles, Taxonomy, Challenges, and Open Questionscited by 1,582
  7. 2018Datasheets for Datasetscited by 1,371
  8. 2023LLM-Blender: Ensembling Large Language Models with Pairwise Ranking and Generative Fusioncited by 550
  9. 2024MARE: Multi-Agents Collaboration Framework for Requirements Engineeringcited by 28
  10. 2024AI based Multiagent Approach for Requirements Elicitation and Analysiscited by 6
  11. 2024Application of AI to formal methods - an analysis of current trendscited by 2

Built on by

Not cited yet.