Is AI Catching Up to Human Expression? Exploring Emotion, Personality, Authorship, and Linguistic Style in English and Arabic with Six Large Language Models
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The advancing fluency of LLMs raises important questions about their ability to emulate complex human traits, including emotional expression and personality, across diverse linguistic and cultural contexts. This study investigates whether LLMs can convincingly mimic emotional nuance in English and personality markers in Arabic, a critical under-resourced language with unique linguistic and cultural characteristics. We conduct two tasks across six models:Jais, Mistral, LLaMA, GPT-4o, Gemini, and DeepSeek. First, we evaluate whether machine classifiers can reliably distinguish between human-authored and AI-generated texts. Second, we assess the extent to which LLM-generated texts exhibit emotional or personality traits comparable to those of humans. Our results demonstrate that AI-generated texts are distinguishable from human-authored ones (F1>0.95), though classification performance deteriorates on paraphrased samples, indicating a reliance on superficial stylistic cues. Emotion and personality classification experiments reveal significant generalization gaps: classifiers trained on human data perform poorly on AI-generated texts and vice versa, suggesting LLMs encode affective signals differently from humans. Importantly, augmenting training with AI-generated data enhances performance in the Arabic personality classification task, highlighting the potential of synthetic data to address challenges in under-resourced languages. Model-specific analyses show that GPT-4o and Gemini exhibit superior affective coherence. Linguistic and psycholinguistic analyses reveal measurable divergences in tone, authenticity, and textual complexity between human and AI texts. These findings have implications for affective computing, authorship attribution, and responsible AI deployment, particularly within underresourced language contexts where generative AI detection and alignment pose unique challenges.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 7 of its 28 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 Mar 2026.
Builds on
7 of 28 references.
References · 7
- 2024Do LLMs Have Distinct and Consistent Personality? TRAIT: Personality Testset designed for LLMs with Psychometricscited by 56
- 2024Authorship Attribution in the Era of LLMs: Problems, Methodologies, and Challengescited by 46
- 2024Can Large Language Models Identify Authorship?cited by 40
- 2024Evaluating the Efficacy of LLMs to Emulate Realistic Human Personalitiescited by 6
- 2024EERPD: Leveraging Emotion and Emotion Regulation for Improving Personality Detectioncited by 6
- 2024Personality Analysis for Social Media Users using Arabic language and its Effect on Sentiment Analysiscited by 2
- 2025A Novel Dialect-Aware Framework for the Classification of Arabic Dialects and Emotionscited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.