UniDial-EvalKit: A Unified Toolkit for Evaluating Multi-Faceted Conversational Abilities
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Benchmarking large language models (LLMs) and agents in multi-turn interactive scenarios is essential for understanding their practical capabilities. However, existing evaluation protocols are highly heterogeneous, differing significantly in dataset formats, model interfaces, and evaluation pipelines, which severely impedes systematic comparison. In this work, we present UniDial-EvalKit (UDE), a unified evaluation toolkit for assessing interactive AI systems. The core contribution of UDE lies in its holistic unification: it standardizes heterogeneous data formats into a universal schema, streamlines complex evaluation pipelines through a modular architecture, and aligns metric calculations under a hierarchical scoring aggregation. It also supports efficient large-scale evaluation through parallel generation and scoring, as well as checkpoint resume to eliminate redundant computation. Leveraging UDE, we conduct an extensive evaluation across diverse multi-dimensional benchmarks. Our empirical analysis shows that no single system consistently outperforms others across all benchmarks, while current memory agents often fail to surpass full-context baselines. Further analyses highlight several future directions, including benchmark deduplication and more adaptive memory architectures.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 32 of its 41 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 Mar 2026.
Builds on
32 of 41 references.
References · 32
- 2019Sentence-BERT: Sentence Embeddings using Siamese BERT-Networkscited by 9,170
- 2023Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arenacited by 8,626
- 2025A-MEM: Agentic Memory for LLM Agentscited by 1,063
- 2024Evaluating Very Long-Term Conversational Memory of LLM Agentscited by 830
- 2025DeepSeek-V3.2: Pushing the Frontier of Open Large Language Modelscited by 815
- 2024LongMemEval: Benchmarking Chat Assistants on Long-Term Interactive Memorycited by 707
- 2026GLM-5: from Vibe Coding to Agentic Engineeringcited by 587
- 2026Kimi K2.5: Visual Agentic Intelligencecited by 501
- 2024From Crowdsourced Data to High-Quality Benchmarks: Arena-Hard and BenchBuilder Pipelinecited by 500
- 2024From Generation to Judgment: Opportunities and Challenges of LLM-as-a-judgecited by 494
- 2024VLMEvalKit: An Open-Source Toolkit for Evaluating Large Multi-Modality Modelscited by 455
- 2025Evaluating Memory in LLM Agents via Incremental Multi-Turn Interactionscited by 254
20 more
- 2024MT-Bench-101: A Fine-Grained Benchmark for Evaluating Large Language Models in Multi-Turn Dialoguescited by 250
- 2025MultiChallenge: A Realistic Multi-Turn Conversation Evaluation Benchmark Challenging to Frontier LLMscited by 180
- 2025LightMem: Lightweight and Efficient Memory-Augmented Generationcited by 180
- 2025Know Me, Respond to Me: Benchmarking LLMs for Dynamic User Profiling and Personalized Responses at Scalecited by 178
- 2025Memory OS of AI Agentcited by 150
- 2025In Prospect and Retrospect: Reflective Memory Management for Long-term Personalized Dialogue Agentscited by 106
- 2023Lift Yourself Up: Retrieval-augmented Text Generation with Self Memorycited by 103
- 2024Multi-IF: Benchmarking LLMs on Multi-Turn and Multilingual Instructions Followingcited by 102
- 2024MT-Eval: A Multi-Turn Capabilities Evaluation Benchmark for Large Language Modelscited by 81
- 2024FairMT-Bench: Benchmarking Fairness for Multi-turn Dialogue in Conversational LLMscited by 36
- 2024MathChat: Benchmarking Mathematical Reasoning and Instruction Following in Multi-Turn Interactionscited by 26
- 2026AMemGym: Interactive Memory Benchmarking for Assistants in Long-Horizon Conversationscited by 20
- 2025Redundancy Principles for MLLMs Benchmarkscited by 19
- 2025CodeIF: Benchmarking the Instruction-Following Capabilities of Large Language Models for Code Generationcited by 19
- 2026Benchmark^2: Systematic Evaluation of LLM Benchmarkscited by 13
- 2025DH-RAG: A Dynamic Historical Context-Powered Retrieval-Augmented Generation Method for Multi-Turn Dialoguecited by 10
- 2025From Tools to Teammates: Evaluating LLMs in Multi-Session Coding Interactionscited by 8
- 2026Evoking User Memory: Personalizing LLM via Recollection-Familiarity Adaptive Retrievalcited by 8
- 2025Benchmark Profiling: Mechanistic Diagnosis of LLM Benchmarkscited by 6
- 2026DYCP: Dynamic Context Pruning for Long-Form Dialogue with LLMscited by 2
Built on by
Not cited yet.