PiCo: Active Manifold Canonicalization for Robust Robotic Visual Anomaly Detection
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Industrial deployment of robotic visual anomaly detection (VAD) is fundamentally constrained by passive perception under diverse 6-DoF pose configurations and unstable operating conditions such as illumination changes and shadows, where intrinsic semantic anomalies and physical disturbances coexist and interact. To overcome these limitations, a paradigm shift from passive feature learning to Active Canonicalization is proposed. PiCo (Pose-in-Condition Canonicalization) is introduced as a unified framework that actively projects observations onto a condition-invariant canonical manifold. PiCo operates through a cascaded mechanism. The first stage, Active Physical Canonicalization, enables a robotic agent to reorient objects in order to reduce geometric uncertainty at its source. The second stage, Neural Latent Canonicalization, adopts a three-stage denoising hierarchy consisting of photometric processing at the input level, latent refinement at the feature level, and contextual reasoning at the semantic level, progressively eliminating nuisance factors across representational scales. Extensive evaluations on the large-scale M2AD benchmark demonstrate the superiority of this paradigm. PiCo achieves a state-of-the-art 93.7% O-AUROC, representing a 3.7% improvement over prior methods in static settings, and attains 98.5% accuracy in active closed-loop scenarios. These results demonstrate that active manifold canonicalization is critical for robust embodied perception.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 23 of its 31 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 Mar 2026.
Builds on
23 of 31 references.
References · 23
- 2020A Simple Framework for Contrastive Learning of Visual Representationscited by 12,049
- 2019Momentum Contrast for Unsupervised Visual Representation Learningcited by 7,513
- 2021MLP-Mixer: An all-MLP Architecture for Visioncited by 1,446
- 2016Deep Variational Information Bottleneckcited by 930
- 2021Towards Total Recall in Industrial Anomaly Detectioncited by 776
- 2021CutPaste: Self-Supervised Learning for Anomaly Detection and Localizationcited by 531
- 2021DRAEM -- A discriminatively trained reconstruction embedding for surface anomaly detectioncited by 514
- 2023SimpleNet: A Simple Network for Image Anomaly Detection and Localizationcited by 256
- 2023EfficientAD: Accurate Visual Anomaly Detection at Millisecond-Level Latenciescited by 160
- 2024Real-IAD: A Real-World Multi-View Dataset for Benchmarking Versatile Industrial Anomaly Detectioncited by 139
- 2022CFA: Coupled-hypersphere-based Feature Adaptation for Target-Oriented Anomaly Localizationcited by 135
- 2024Dinomaly: The Less Is More Philosophy in Multi-Class Unsupervised Anomaly Detectioncited by 93
11 more
- 2020The Conditional Entropy Bottleneckcited by 75
- 2021Hire-MLP: Vision MLP via Hierarchical Rearrangementcited by 66
- 2025Exploring Intrinsic Normal Prototypes within a Single Image for Universal Anomaly Detectioncited by 48
- 2024A Canonicalization Perspective on Invariant and Equivariant Learningcited by 27
- 2023MSFlow: Multi-Scale Flow-based Framework for Unsupervised Anomaly Detectioncited by 25
- 2024An End-to-End Robust Point Cloud Semantic Segmentation Network with Single-Step Conditional Diffusion Modelscited by 23
- 2025Robust Single-Stage Fully Sparse 3D Object Detection via Detachable Latent Diffusioncited by 12
- 2023Recognizable Information Bottleneckcited by 5
- 2024DI-Retinex: Digital-Imaging Retinex Theory for Low-Light Image Enhancementcited by 5
- 2025Visual Anomaly Detection under Complex View-Illumination Interplay: A Large-Scale Benchmarkcited by 4
- 2026CNMBI: Determining the Number of Clusters Using Center Pairwise Matching and Boundary Filteringcited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.