mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Machine Learning Models for the Early Detection of Burnout in Software Engineering: a Systematic Literature Review

arXiv 2603.23063 ↗First posted 24 Mar 2026cs.SE cs.AI cs.CYcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Burnout is an occupational syndrome that, like many other professions, affects the majority of software engineers. Past research studies showed important trends, including an increasing use of machine learning techniques to allow for an early detection of burnout. This paper is a systematic literature review (SLR) of the research papers that proposed machine learning (ML) approaches, and focused on detecting burnout in software developers and IT professionals. Our objective is to review the accuracy and precision of the proposed ML techniques, and to formulate recommendations for future researchers interested to replicate or extend those studies. From our SLR we observed that a majority of primary studies focuses on detecting emotions or utilise emotional dimensions to detect or predict the presence of burnout. We also performed a cross-sectional study to detect which ML approach shows a better performance at detecting emotions; and which dataset has more potential and expressivity to capture emotions. We believe that, by identifying which ML tools and datasets show a better performance at detecting emotions, and indirectly at identifying burnout, our paper can be a valuable asset to progress in this important research direction.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 18 of its 166 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 Mar 2026.

Builds on

18 of 166 references.

References · 18

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
  2. 2023SWE-bench: Can Language Models Resolve Real-World GitHub Issues?cited by 3,193
  3. 2020Data and its (dis)contents: A survey of dataset development and use in machine learning researchcited by 259
  4. 2022The choice of scaling technique matters for classification performancecited by 25
  5. 2023Exploring ChatGPT for Toxicity Detection in GitHubcited by 15
  6. 2018Google Scholar, Web of Science, and Scopus: a systematic comparison of citations in 252 subject categoriescited by 8
  7. 2022Automated Identification of Toxic Code Reviews Using ToxiCRcited by 8
  8. 2016Mining Valence, Arousal, and Dominance - Possibilities for Detecting Burnout and Productivity?cited by 6
  9. 2021Towards offensive language detection and reduction in four Software Engineering communitiescited by 5
  10. 2020A Benchmark Study of the Contemporary Toxicity Detectors on Software Engineering Interactionscited by 4
  11. 2023ToxiSpanSE: An Explainable Toxicity Detection in Code Review Commentscited by 4
  12. 2020Identifying the Mood of a Software Development Team by Analyzing Text-Based Communication in Chats with Machine Learningcited by 3
6 more
  1. 2021Development and Application of Sentiment Analysis Tools in Software Engineering: A Systematic Literature Reviewcited by 3
  2. 2020Recognizing Developers' Emotions while Programmingcited by 2
  3. 2022Incivility Detection in Open Source Code Review and Issue Discussionscited by 2
  4. 2024Emotion Classification In Software Engineering Texts: A Comparative Analysis of Pre-trained Transformers Language Modelscited by 2
  5. 2013The Role of Emotions in Contributors Activity: A Case Study on the GENTOO Communitycited by 1
  6. 2018Total Recall, Language Processing, and Software Engineeringcited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.