Between the Layers Lies the Truth: Uncertainty Estimation in LLMs Using Intra-Layer Local Information Scores
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Large language models (LLMs) are often confidently wrong, making reliable uncertainty estimation (UE) essential. Output-based heuristics are cheap but brittle, while probing internal representations is effective yet high-dimensional and hard to transfer. We propose a compact, per-instance UE method that scores cross-layer agreement patterns in internal representations using a single forward pass. Across three models, our method matches probing in-distribution, with mean diagonal differences of at most -1.8 AUPRC percentage points and +4.9 Brier score points. Under cross-dataset transfer, it consistently outperforms probing, achieving off-diagonal gains up to +2.86 AUPRC and +21.02 Brier points. Under 4-bit weight-only quantization, it remains robust, improving over probing by +1.94 AUPRC points and +5.33 Brier points on average. Beyond performance, examining specific layer--layer interactions reveals differences in how disparate models encode uncertainty. Altogether, our UE method offers a lightweight, compact means to capture transferable uncertainty in LLMs.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 26 of its 43 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 17 Mar 2026.
Builds on
26 of 43 references.
References · 26
- 2021Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problemscited by 9,743
- 2020Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understandingcited by 7,768
- 2015Dropout as a Bayesian Approximation: Representing Model Uncertainty in Deep Learningcited by 4,416
- 2016Simple and Scalable Predictive Uncertainty Estimation using Deep Ensemblescited by 3,888
- 2018HotpotQA: A Dataset for Diverse, Explainable Multi-hop Question Answeringcited by 3,686
- 2017TriviaQA: A Large Scale Distantly Supervised Challenge Dataset for Reading Comprehensioncited by 2,895
- 2017A Broad-Coverage Challenge Corpus for Sentence Understanding through Inferencecited by 2,665
- 2022Language Models (Mostly) Know What They Knowcited by 1,783
- 2016Deep Variational Information Bottleneckcited by 915
- 2021Probing Classifiers: Promises, Shortcomings, and Advancescited by 831
- 2023The Internal State of an LLM Knows When It's Lyingcited by 644
- 2017Opening the Black Box of Deep Neural Networks via Informationcited by 494
14 more
- 2025Phi-4-Mini Technical Report: Compact yet Powerful Multimodal Language Models via Mixture-of-LoRAscited by 491
- 2018Analysis Methods in Neural Language Processing: A Surveycited by 276
- 2024LLMs Know More Than They Show: On the Intrinsic Representation of LLM Hallucinationscited by 230
- 2017Emergence of Invariance and Disentanglement in Deep Representationscited by 213
- 2024What Large Language Models Know and What People Think They Knowcited by 109
- 2023Cognitive Dissonance: Why Do Language Model Outputs Disagree with Internal Representations of Truthfulness?cited by 62
- 2024Estimating Knowledge in Large Language Models Without Generating a Single Tokencited by 39
- 2023Faster Minimum Bayes Risk Decoding with Confidence-based Pruningcited by 34
- 2023On Uncertainty Calibration and Selective Generation in Probabilistic Neural Summarization: A Benchmark Studycited by 25
- 2025Beyond Token Probes: Hallucination Detection via Activation Tensors with ACT-ViTcited by 16
- 2023Out-of-Distribution Detection by Leveraging Between-Layer Transformation Smoothnesscited by 15
- 2023HeRo: RoBERTa and Longformer Hebrew Language Modelscited by 12
- 2025Uncertainty-Aware Decoding with Minimum Bayes Riskcited by 10
- 2024Seq-VCR: Preventing Collapse in Intermediate Transformer Representations for Enhanced Reasoningcited by 9
Built on by
Not cited yet.