The Average Relative Entropy and Transpilation Depth determines the noise robustness in Variational Quantum Classifiers
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Variational Quantum Algorithms (VQAs) have been extensively researched for applications in Quantum Machine Learning (QML), Optimization, and Molecular simulations. Although designed for Noisy Intermediate-Scale Quantum (NISQ) devices, VQAs are predominantly evaluated classically due to uncertain results on noisy devices and limited resource availability. Raising concern over the reproducibility of simulated VQAs on noisy hardware. While prior studies indicate that VQAs may exhibit noise resilience in specific parameterized shallow quantum circuits, there are no definitive measures to establish what defines a shallow circuit or the optimal circuit depth for VQAs on a noisy platform. These challenges extend naturally to Variational Quantum Classification (VQC) algorithms, a subclass of VQAs for supervised learning. In this article, we propose a relative entropy-based metric to verify whether a VQC model would perform similarly on a noisy device as it does on simulations. We establish a strong correlation between the average relative entropy difference in classes, transpilation circuit depth, and their performance difference on a noisy quantum device. Our results further indicate that circuit depth alone is insufficient to characterize shallow circuits. We present empirical evidence to support these assertions across a diverse array of techniques for implementing VQC, datasets, and multiple noisy quantum devices.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 12 of its 39 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 Mar 2026.
Builds on
12 of 39 references.
References · 12
- 2020Variational Quantum Algorithmscited by 692
- 2018Supervised learning with quantum enhanced feature spacescited by 665
- 2020Noise-Induced Barren Plateaus in Variational Quantum Algorithmscited by 193
- 2024Better than classical? The subtle art of benchmarking quantum machine learning modelscited by 85
- 2024Quantum Convolutional Neural Networks are Effectively Classically Simulablecited by 37
- 2020Deep Networks and the Multiple Manifold Problemcited by 35
- 2020An Intuitive Tutorial to Gaussian Process Regressioncited by 16
- 2023Quantum Neural Estimation of Entropiescited by 6
- 2023Shot Optimization in Quantum Machine Learning Architectures to Accelerate Trainingcited by 5
- 2025Data re-uploading in Quantum Machine Learning for time series: application to traffic forecastingcited by 5
- 2020Towards Ground Truth Explainability on Tabular Datacited by 4
- 2025Benchmarking data encoding methods in Quantum Machine Learningcited by 2
Built on by
Not cited yet.