TabPFN Extensions for Interpretable Geotechnical Modelling
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Geotechnical site characterisation relies on sparse, heterogeneous borehole data, where uncertainty quantification and interpretability matter as much as predictive accuracy. We evaluate TabPFN~citepHollmann2025, a tabular foundation model, and its texttttabpfn-extensions library on two geotechnical tasks: (1) soil-type classification from N-value and shear-wave velocity data as a controlled illustrative case, and (2) iterative imputation of five mechanical parameters (su, Eu, σ'p, Cc, Cv) in BM/AirportSoilProperties/2/2025. Without retraining, we apply cosine-similarity analysis to TabPFN embeddings, visualise predictive distributions, and compute SHAP attributions. On the regression benchmark we compare TabPFN with mean imputation, linear regression, random forests, XGBoost, and HBM; introduce a proxy decomposition of predictive uncertainty across context-perturbation classes; and propagate marginal Cc and σ'p distributions through a one-dimensional consolidation model to obtain the reliability index β and serviceability exceedance probability Pf. Embeddings exhibit label-consistent Clay/Sand grouping; iterative imputation reduces RMSE for all five targets, with TabPFN lowest on four; SHAP attributions are consistent with the Skempton compression-index correlation and the inverse preconsolidation-pressure-water-content dependence; the within-posterior component is largest in the proxy decomposition. We position the contribution as a worked evaluation workflow that may complement established methods for data-scarce geotechnics, not as algorithmic innovation.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 3 of its 27 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 Mar 2026.
Builds on
3 of 27 references.
References · 3
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.
- 2026TabPFN-3: Technical Reportcited by 17
- 2026TabPFN-3: Technical Report13 May 2026