Knowledge Boundary Discovery for Large Language Models
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We propose Knowledge Boundary Discovery (KBD), a reinforcement learning based framework to explore the knowledge boundaries of the Large Language Models (LLMs). We define the knowledge boundary by automatically generating two types of questions: (i) those the LLM can confidently answer (within-knowledge boundary) and (ii) those it cannot (beyond-knowledge boundary). Iteratively exploring and exploiting the LLM's responses to find its knowledge boundaries is challenging because of the hallucination phenomenon. To find the knowledge boundaries of an LLM, the agent interacts with the LLM under the modeling of exploring a partially observable environment. The agent generates a progressive question as the action, adopts an entropy reduction as the reward, receives the LLM's response as the observation and updates its belief states. We demonstrate that the KBD detects knowledge boundaries of LLMs by automatically finding a set of non-trivial answerable and unanswerable questions. We validate the KBD by comparing its generated knowledge boundaries with manually crafted LLM benchmark datasets. Experiments show that our KBD-generated question set is comparable to the human-generated datasets. Our approach paves a new way to evaluate LLMs.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 28 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 Jan 2026.
Builds on
20 of 28 references.
References · 20
- 2020Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP Taskscited by 9,160
- 2021SimCSE: Simple Contrastive Learning of Sentence Embeddingscited by 2,168
- 2022Large Language Models Encode Clinical Knowledgecited by 1,807
- 2024ChatGLM: A Family of Large Language Models from GLM-130B to GLM-4 All Toolscited by 1,096
- 2020On Faithfulness and Factuality in Abstractive Summarizationcited by 895
- 2023The RefinedWeb Dataset for Falcon LLM: Outperforming Curated Corpora with Web Data, and Web Data Onlycited by 755
- 2024INSIDE: LLMs' Internal States Retain the Power of Hallucination Detectioncited by 317
- 2023Fine-tuning Language Models for Factualitycited by 219
- 2023LM vs LM: Detecting Factual Errors via Cross Examinationcited by 155
- 2023Extreme Q-Learning: MaxEnt RL without Entropycited by 113
- 2023How to Catch an AI Liar: Lie Detection in Black-Box LLMs by Asking Unrelated Questionscited by 82
- 2024Self-Alignment for Factuality: Mitigating Hallucinations in LLMs via Self-Evaluationcited by 79
8 more
- 2024Benchmarking Knowledge Boundary for Large Language Models: A Different Perspective on Model Evaluationcited by 37
- 2022Decoupling Knowledge from Memorization: Retrieval-augmented Prompt Learningcited by 36
- 2023Examining LLMs' Uncertainty Expression Towards Questions Outside Parametric Knowledgecited by 32
- 2024Teaching Large Language Models to Express Knowledge Boundary from Their Own Signalscited by 32
- 2023Measuring and Modifying Factual Knowledge in Large Language Modelscited by 16
- 2022Asking for Knowledge: Training RL Agents to Query External Knowledge Using Languagecited by 10
- 2023Model-free Posterior Sampling via Learning Rate Randomizationcited by 6
- 2022Goal-Conditioned Q-Learning as Knowledge Distillationcited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.