Joint Surrogate Learning of Objectives, Constraints, and Sensitivities for Efficient Multi-objective Optimization of Neural Dynamical Systems
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Gaussian process surrogates dominate constrained multi-objective optimization because they are effective in data-scarce regimes, but their cubic scaling in training samples limits their ability to capture shared structure between objectives and constraints as problems grow in dimensionality. We show that deterministic neural network surrogates, equipped with feature tokenization and adaptive output normalization, match or exceed Gaussian process accuracy, while scaling to high-dimensional output spaces and training on all data including infeasible samples. Jointly training a single Feature Tokenizer Transformer to predict objectives, constraint satisfaction, and parameter sensitivities yields a unified gradient that simultaneously improves objective values, steers toward feasibility, and identifies the most influential parameters: a coherent search signal that disjoint per-output models cannot provide. We validate this on biophysical neural optimization problems of increasing complexity. In the hardest regime, with wide, uninformed parameter bounds where random sampling finds zero feasible solutions, descending the surrogate's learned constraint gradient steers the search into the feasible region and recovers near-optimal solutions where standard surrogate optimization and constrained Bayesian optimization find none.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 60 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 Mar 2026.
Builds on
17 of 60 references.
References · 17
- 2017GradNorm: Gradient Normalization for Adaptive Loss Balancing in Deep Multitask Networkscited by 816
- 2016Automatic chemical design using a data-driven continuous representation of moleculescited by 762
- 2018Evidential Deep Learning to Quantify Classification Uncertaintycited by 728
- 2021Revisiting Deep Learning Models for Tabular Datacited by 725
- 2018GPyTorch: Blackbox Matrix-Matrix Gaussian Process Inference with GPU Accelerationcited by 603
- 2020Bayesian Deep Learning and a Probabilistic Perspective of Generalizationcited by 480
- 2015Deep Kernel Learningcited by 440
- 2015Scalable Bayesian Optimization Using Deep Neural Networkscited by 284
- 2021Ensemble deep learning: A reviewcited by 283
- 2018When Gaussian Process Meets Big Data: A Review of Scalable GPscited by 205
- 2020Differentiable Expected Hypervolume Improvement for Parallel Multi-Objective Bayesian Optimizationcited by 176
- 2023Unexpected Improvements to Expected Improvement for Bayesian Optimizationcited by 144
5 more
- 2021Parallel Bayesian Optimization of Multiple Noisy Objectives with Expected Hypervolume Improvementcited by 115
- 2018Maximizing acquisition functions for Bayesian optimizationcited by 113
- 2014Bayesian Optimization with Unknown Constraintscited by 109
- 2015Predictive Entropy Search for Bayesian Optimization with Unknown Constraintscited by 51
- 2016BluePyOpt: Leveraging open source software and cloud infrastructure to optimise model parameters in neurosciencecited by 4
Built on by
Not cited yet.