The Binding Effect: Analyzing How Multi-Dimensional Cues Form Gender Bias in Instruction TTS
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Current bias evaluations in Instruction Text-to-Speech (ITTS) often rely on univariate testing, overlooking the compositional structure of social cues. In this work, we investigate gender bias by modeling prompts as combinations of Social Status, Career stereotypes, and Persona descriptors. Analyzing open-source ITTS models, we uncover systematic interaction effects where social dimensions modulate one another, creating complex bias patterns missed by univariate baselines. Crucially, our findings indicate that these biases extend beyond surface-level artifacts, demonstrating strong associations with the semantic priors of pre-trained text encoders and the skewed distributions inherent in training data. We further demonstrate that generic diversity prompting is insufficient to override these entrenched patterns, underscoring the need for compositional analysis to diagnose latent risks in generative speech.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 19 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 21 Mar 2026.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025Gender Bias in Instruction-Guided Speech Synthesis Models
- 2025Who Gets the Mic? Investigating Gender Bias in the Speaker Assignment of a Speech-LLM
- 2026Alignment Reduces Expressed but Not Encoded Gender Bias: A Unified Framework and Study
- 2024How far can bias go? Tracing bias from pretraining data to alignment
- 2023Sensitivity, Performance, Robustness: Deconstructing the Effect of Sociodemographic Prompting
- 2023Can Instruction Fine-Tuned Language Models Identify Social Bias through Prompting?
- 2025Bias after Prompting: Persistent Discrimination in Large Language Models
- 2026Contaminated Collaboration: Measuring Gender Bias Transfer in LLM-Assisted Student Writing