An Industrial-Scale Retrieval-Augmented Generation Framework for Requirements Engineering: Empirical Evaluation with Automotive Manufacturing Data
On the map: Retrieval-augmented generation → RAG pipeline design and evaluation
Abstract (arXiv)
Requirements engineering in Industry 4.0 faces critical challenges with heterogeneous, unstructured documentation spanning technical specifications, supplier lists, and compliance standards. While retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) shows promise for knowledge-intensive tasks, no prior work has evaluated RAG on authentic industrial RE workflows using comprehensive production-grade performance metrics. This paper presents a comprehensive empirical evaluation of RAG for industrial requirements engineering automation using authentic automotive manufacturing documentation comprising 669 requirements across four specification standards (MBN 9666-1, MBN 9666-2, BQF 9666-5, MBN 9666-9) spanning 2015-2023, plus 49 supplier qualifications with extensive supporting documentation. Through controlled comparisons with BERT-based and ungrounded LLM approaches, the framework achieves 98.2% extraction accuracy with complete traceability, outperforming baselines by 24.4% and 19.6%, respectively. Hybrid semantic-lexical retrieval achieves MRR of 0.847. Expert quality assessment averaged 4.32/5.0 across five dimensions. The evaluation demonstrates 83% reduction in manual analysis time and 47% cost savings through multi-provider LLM orchestration. Ablation studies quantify individual component contributions. Longitudinal analysis reveals a 55% reduction in requirement volume coupled with 1,800% increase in IT security focus, identifying 10 legacy suppliers (20.4%) requiring requalification, representing potential 2.3M in avoided contract penalties.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in RAG pipeline design and evaluation, one of 15 directions in Retrieval-augmented generation. Builds on 7 of its 22 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 Mar 2026.
Builds on
7 of 22 references.
Closest ancestors · 1
Same direction, newest first
Other references · 6
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
- 2020Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP Taskscited by 9,160
- 2020Leveraging Passage Retrieval with Generative Models for Open Domain Question Answeringcited by 1,203
- 2023LLMLingua: Compressing Prompts for Accelerated Inference of Large Language Modelscited by 279
- 2021Retrieval Augmented Code Generation and Summarizationcited by 148
- 2018Traceability in the Wild: Automatically Augmenting Incomplete Trace Linkscited by 4
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025TVR: Automotive System Requirement Traceability Validation and Recovery Through Retrieval-Augmented Generation
- 2025Retrieval-Augmented Multi-LLM Ensemble for Industrial Part Specification Extraction
- 2025Towards Requirements Engineering for RAG Systems
- 2025Retrieval-Augmented Generation in Industry: An Interview Study on Use Cases, Requirements, Challenges, and Evaluation
- 2025An Agile Method for Implementing Retrieval Augmented Generation Tools in Industrial SMEs
- 2024Generating Test Scenarios from NL Requirements using Retrieval-Augmented LLMs: An Industrial Study
- 2024Adopting RAG for LLM-Aided Future Vehicle Design
- 2024RAG Does Not Work for Enterprises