mlsanityData to 13 Oct 2026

Interpretable Multiple Myeloma Prognosis with Observational Medical Outcomes Partnership Data

arXiv 2603.20341 ↗First posted 20 Mar 2026cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Machine learning (ML) promises better clinical decision-making, yet opaque model behavior limits the adoption in healthcare. We propose two novel regularization techniques for ensuring the interpretability of ML models trained on real-world data. In particular, we consider the prediction of five-year survival for multiple myeloma patients using clinical data from Helsinki University Hospital. To ensure the interpretability of the trained models, we use two alternative constructions for a penalty term used for regularization. The first one penalizes deviations from the predictions obtained from an interpretable logistic regression method with two manually chosen features. The second construction requires consistency of model predictions with the revised international staging system (R-ISS). We verify the usefulness of the proposed regularization techniques in numerical experiments using data from 812 patients. They achieve an accuracy up to 0.721 on a test set and SHAP values show that the models rely on the selected important features.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 13 Oct 2026). Builds on 4 of its 20 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 Mar 2026.

Builds on

4 of 20 references.

References · 4

  1. 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,515
  2. 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,055
  3. 2020Explainable Empirical Risk Minimizationcited by 4
  4. 2024Stronger Baseline Models -- A Key Requirement for Aligning Machine Learning Research with Clinical Utilitycited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.