mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

TAPAS: Efficient Two-Server Asymmetric Private Aggregation Beyond Prio(+)

arXiv 2603.19949 ↗First posted 20 Mar 2026cs.CR cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Privacy-preserving aggregation is a cornerstone for AI systems that learn from distributed data without exposing individual records, especially in federated learning and telemetry. Existing two-server protocols (e.g., Prio and successors) set a practical baseline by validating inputs while preventing any single party from learning users' values, but they impose symmetric costs on both servers and communication that scales with the per-client input dimension L. Modern learning tasks routinely involve dimensionalities L in the tens to hundreds of millions of model parameters. We present TAPAS, a two-server asymmetric private aggregation scheme that addresses these limitations along four dimensions: (i) no trusted setup or preprocessing, (ii) server-side communication that is independent of L (iii) post-quantum security based solely on standard lattice assumptions (LWE, SIS), and (iv) stronger robustness with identifiable abort and full malicious security for the servers. A key design choice is intentional asymmetry: one server bears the O(L) aggregation and verification work, while the other operates as a lightweight facilitator with computation independent of L. This reduces total cost, enables the secondary server to run on commodity hardware, and strengthens the non-collusion assumption of the servers. One of our main contributions is a suite of new and efficient lattice-based zero-knowledge proofs; to our knowledge, we are the first to establish privacy and correctness with identifiable abort in the two-server setting.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 7 of its 57 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 Mar 2026.

Builds on

7 of 57 references.

References · 7

  1. 2021Back to the Drawing Board: A Critical Evaluation of Poisoning Attacks on Production Federated Learningcited by 116
  2. 2020Local and Central Differential Privacy for Robustness and Privacy in Federated Learningcited by 72
  3. 2021Eluding Secure Aggregation in Federated Learning via Model Inconsistencycited by 66
  4. 2017Prio: Private, Robust, and Scalable Computation of Aggregate Statisticscited by 35
  5. 2023Flamingo: Multi-Round Single-Server Secure Aggregation with Applications to Private Federated Learningcited by 16
  6. 2021Towards Sparse Federated Analytics: Location Heatmaps under Distributed Differential Privacy with Secure Aggregationcited by 10
  7. 2025Armadillo: Robust Single-Server Secure Aggregation for Federated Learning with Input Validationcited by 2

Built on by

Not cited yet.