mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Evaluating Vision Foundation Models for Pixel and Object Classification in Microscopy

arXiv 2603.19802 ↗First posted 20 Mar 2026cs.CVcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Deep learning underlies most modern approaches and tools in computer vision, including biomedical imaging. However, for interactive semantic segmentation (often called pixel classification in this context) and interactive object-level classification (object classification), feature-based shallow learning remains widely used. This is due to the diversity of data in this domain, the lack of large pretraining datasets, and the need for computational and label efficiency. In contrast, state-of-the-art tools for many other vision tasks in microscopy - most notably cellular instance segmentation - already rely on deep learning and have recently benefited substantially from vision foundation models (VFMs), particularly SAM. Here, we investigate whether VFMs can also improve pixel and object classification compared to current approaches. To this end, we evaluate several VFMs, including general-purpose models (SAM, SAM2, SAM3, DINOv3) and domain-specific ones (μSAM, PathoSAM, KRONOS), in combination with shallow learning and attentive probing on five diverse and challenging datasets. Our results demonstrate consistent improvements over hand-crafted features and provide a clear pathway toward practical improvements. Furthermore, our study establishes a benchmark for VFMs in microscopy and informs future developments in this area.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 24 of its 45 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 Mar 2026.

Builds on

24 of 45 references.

References · 24

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,456
  3. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 29,915
  4. 2015U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentationcited by 19,604
  5. 2023Segment Anythingcited by 8,158
  6. 2023DINOv2: Learning Robust Visual Features without Supervisioncited by 7,764
  7. 2021Masked Autoencoders Are Scalable Vision Learnerscited by 7,339
  8. 2021Emerging Properties in Self-Supervised Vision Transformerscited by 6,893
  9. 2023Grounding DINO: Marrying DINO with Grounded Pre-Training for Open-Set Object Detectioncited by 3,274
  10. 2023Sigmoid Loss for Language Image Pre-Trainingcited by 3,048
  11. 2024SAM 2: Segment Anything in Images and Videoscited by 2,784
  12. 2025DINOv3cited by 1,297
12 more
  1. 2024Grounded SAM: Assembling Open-World Models for Diverse Visual Taskscited by 914
  2. 2025SAM 3: Segment Anything with Conceptscited by 835
  3. 2024Molmo and PixMo: Open Weights and Open Data for State-of-the-Art Vision-Language Modelscited by 321
  4. 2025Perception Encoder: The best visual embeddings are not at the output of the networkcited by 315
  5. 2018Cell Detection with Star-convex Polygonscited by 182
  6. 2024FeatUp: A Model-Agnostic Framework for Features at Any Resolutioncited by 114
  7. 2020PanNuke Dataset Extension, Insights and Baselinescited by 113
  8. 2025JAFAR: Jack up Any Feature at Any Resolutioncited by 21
  9. 2025A Foundation Model for Spatial Proteomicscited by 12
  10. 2025Attention, Please! Revisiting Attentive Probing Through the Lens of Efficiencycited by 11
  11. 2025Segment Anything for Histopathologycited by 9
  12. 2026Revisiting foundation models for cell instance segmentationcited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.