VeloxNet: Efficient Spatial Gating for Lightweight Embedded Image Classification
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Deploying deep learning models on embedded devices for tasks such as aerial disaster monitoring and infrastructure inspection requires architectures that balance accuracy with strict constraints on model size, memory, and latency. This paper introduces VeloxNet, a lightweight CNN architecture that replaces SqueezeNet's fire modules with gated multi-layer perceptron (gMLP) blocks for embedded image classification. Each gMLP block uses a spatial gating unit (SGU) that applies learned spatial projections and multiplicative gating, enabling the network to capture spatial dependencies across the full feature map in a single layer. Unlike fire modules, which are limited to local receptive fields defined by small convolutional kernels, the SGU provides global spatial modeling at each layer with fewer parameters. We evaluate VeloxNet on three aerial image datasets: the Aerial Image Database for Emergency Response (AIDER), the Comprehensive Disaster Dataset (CDD), and the Levee Defect Dataset (LDD), comparing against eleven baselines including MobileNet variants, ShuffleNet, EfficientNet, and recent vision transformers. VeloxNet reduces the parameter count by 46.1% relative to SqueezeNet (from 740,970 to 399,366) while improving weighted F1 scores by 6.32% on AIDER, 30.83% on CDD, and 2.51% on LDD. These results demonstrate that substituting local convolutional modules with spatial gating blocks can improve both classification accuracy and parameter efficiency for resource-constrained deployment. The source code will be made publicly available upon acceptance of the paper.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 16 of its 24 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 19 Mar 2026.
Builds on
16 of 24 references.
References · 16
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
- 2019EfficientNet: Rethinking Model Scaling for Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 6,442
- 2014Going Deeper with Convolutionscited by 4,241
- 2017MobileNets: Efficient Convolutional Neural Networks for Mobile Vision Applicationscited by 3,845
- 2015Deep Compression: Compressing Deep Neural Networks with Pruning, Trained Quantization and Huffman Codingcited by 2,329
- 2016Inception-v4, Inception-ResNet and the Impact of Residual Connections on Learningcited by 1,512
- 2016SqueezeNet: AlexNet-level accuracy with 50x fewer parameters and <0.5MB model sizecited by 1,060
- 2021Pay Attention to MLPscited by 368
- 2020Stable Low-rank Tensor Decomposition for Compression of Convolutional Neural Networkcited by 74
- 2019Deep-Learning-Based Aerial Image Classification for Emergency Response Applications Using Unmanned Aerial Vehiclescited by 25
- 2023Unified Data-Free Compression: Pruning and Quantization without Fine-Tuningcited by 23
4 more
- 2020Comprehensive Semantic Segmentation on High Resolution UAV Imagery for Natural Disaster Damage Assessmentcited by 12
- 2024Imbalance-Aware Culvert-Sewer Defect Segmentation Using an Enhanced Feature Pyramid Networkcited by 7
- 2020Exploiting Weight Redundancy in CNNs: Beyond Pruning and Quantizationcited by 3
- 2020Automated Model Compression by Jointly Applied Pruning and Quantizationcited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.