mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

HEP Statistical Inference for UAV Fault Detection: CLs, LRT, and SBI Applied to Blade Damage

arXiv 2603.18546 ↗First posted 19 Mar 2026cs.LG cs.RO cs.SYcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

This paper transfers three statistical methods from particle physics to multirotor propeller fault detection: the likelihood ratio test (LRT) for binary detection, the CLs modified frequentist method for false alarm rate control, and sequential neural posterior estimation (SNPE) for quantitative fault characterization. Operating on spectral features tied to rotor harmonic physics, the system returns three outputs: binary detection, controlled false alarm rates, and calibrated posteriors over fault severity and motor location. On UAV-FD, a hexarotor dataset of 18 real flights with 5% and 10% blade damage, leave-one-flight-out cross-validation gives AUC 0.862 +/- 0.007 (95% CI: 0.849--0.876), outperforming CUSUM (0.708 +/- 0.010), autoencoder (0.753 +/- 0.009), and LSTM autoencoder (0.551). At 5% false alarm rate the system detects 93% of significant and 81% of subtle blade damage. On PADRE, a quadrotor platform, AUC reaches 0.986 after refitting only the generative models. SNPE gives a full posterior over fault severity (90% credible interval coverage 92--100%, MAE 0.012), so the output includes uncertainty rather than just a point estimate or fault flag. Per-flight sequential detection achieves 100% fault detection with 94% overall accuracy.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 2 of its 13 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 19 Mar 2026.

Builds on

2 of 13 references.

References · 2

  1. 2019The frontier of simulation-based inferencecited by 502
  2. 2016LSTM-based Encoder-Decoder for Multi-sensor Anomaly Detectioncited by 215

Built on by

Not cited yet.