Starting Off on the Wrong Foot: Pitfalls in Data Preparation
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
When working with real-world insurance data, practitioners often encounter challenges during the data preparation stage that can undermine the statistical validity and reliability of downstream modeling. This study illustrates that conventional data preparation procedures such as random train-test partitioning, often yield unreliable and unstable results when confronted with highly imbalanced insurance loss data. To mitigate these limitations, we propose a novel data preparation framework leveraging two recent statistical advancements: support points for representative data splitting to ensure distributional consistency across partitions, and the Chatterjee correlation coefficient for initial, non-parametric feature screening to capture feature relevance and dependence structure. We further integrate these theoretical advances into a unified, efficient framework that also incorporates missing-data handling, and embed this framework within our custom InsurAutoML pipeline. The performance of the proposed approach is evaluated using both simulated datasets and datasets often cited in the academic literature. Our findings definitively demonstrate that incorporating statistically rigorous data preparation methods not only significantly enhances model robustness and interpretability but also substantially reduces computational resource requirements across diverse insurance loss modeling tasks. This work provides a crucial methodological upgrade for achieving reliable results in high stakes insurance applications.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 9 of its 38 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 18 Mar 2026.
Builds on
9 of 38 references.
References · 9
- 2016XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting Systemcited by 5,166
- 2020AutoGluon-Tabular: Robust and Accurate AutoML for Structured Datacited by 383
- 2018Graphical Models for Processing Missing Datacited by 58
- 2016Support pointscited by 39
- 2019A simple measure of conditional dependencecited by 38
- 2021Data Twinningcited by 10
- 2021Mixture composite regression models with multi-type feature selectioncited by 2
- 2024Automated Machine Learning in Insurancecited by 2
- 2022Bayesian Non-Homogeneous Hidden Markov Model with Variable Selection for Investigating Drivers of Seizure Risk Cyclingcited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.