mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Towards Differentiating Between Failures and Domain Shifts in Industrial Data Streams

arXiv 2603.18032 ↗First posted 9 Mar 2026cs.LG cs.AI stat.MLcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Anomaly and failure detection methods are crucial in identifying deviations from normal system operational conditions, which allows for actions to be taken in advance, usually preventing more serious damages. Long-lasting deviations indicate failures, while sudden, isolated changes in the data indicate anomalies. However, in many practical applications, changes in the data do not always represent abnormal system states. Such changes may be recognized incorrectly as failures, while being a normal evolution of the system, e.g. referring to characteristics of starting the processing of a new product, i.e. realizing a domain shift. Therefore, distinguishing between failures and such ''healthy'' changes in data distribution is critical to ensure the practical robustness of the system. In this paper, we propose a method that not only detects changes in the data distribution and anomalies but also allows us to distinguish between failures and normal domain shifts inherent to a given process. The proposed method consists of a modified Page-Hinkley changepoint detector for identification of the domain shift and possible failures and supervised domain-adaptation-based algorithms for fast, online anomaly detection. These two are coupled with an explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) component that aims at helping the human operator to finally differentiate between domain shifts and failures. The method is illustrated by an experiment on a data stream from the steel factory.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 6 of its 32 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 9 Mar 2026.

Builds on

6 of 32 references.

References · 6

  1. 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,555
  2. 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,070
  3. 2015Domain-Adversarial Training of Neural Networkscited by 3,044
  4. 2017Counterfactual Explanations without Opening the Black Box: Automated Decisions and the GDPRcited by 1,089
  5. 2018A Survey Of Methods For Explaining Black Box Modelscited by 973
  6. 2024A multi-criteria approach for selecting an explanation from the set of counterfactuals produced by an ensemble of explainerscited by 7

Built on by

Not cited yet.