mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Agentic Framework for Political Biography Extraction

arXiv 2603.18010 ↗First posted 23 Feb 2026cs.CL cs.AI cs.CYcited by 0

On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Web, search, and research agents

Abstract (arXiv)

The production of large-scale political datasets typically demands extracting structured facts from vast piles of unstructured documents or web sources, a task that traditionally relies on expensive human experts and remains prohibitively difficult to automate at scale. In this paper, we leverage Large Language Models (LLMs) to automate the extraction of multi-dimensional elite biographies, addressing a long-standing bottleneck in political science research. We propose a two-stage ``Synthesis-Coding'' framework for complex extraction task: an upstream synthesis stage that uses recursive agentic LLMs to search, filter, and curate biography from heterogeneous web sources, followed by a downstream coding stage that maps curated biography into structured dataframes. We validate this framework through three primary results. First, we demonstrate that, when given curated contexts, LLM coders match or outperform human experts in extraction accuracy. Second, we show that in web environments, the agentic system synthesizes more information from web resources than human collective intelligence (Wikipedia). Finally, we diagnosed that directly coding from long and multi-language corpora introduces bias that the synthesis stage can alleviate by curating evidence into signal-dense representations. By comprehensive evaluation, We provide a generalizable, scalable framework for building transparent and expansible large scale database in political science.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Web, search, and research agents, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 3 of its 76 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 23 Feb 2026.

Builds on

3 of 76 references.

References · 3

  1. 2024LLMs-as-Judges: A Comprehensive Survey on LLM-based Evaluation Methodscited by 451
  2. 2023Large Language Models Can Be Used to Estimate the Latent Positions of Politicianscited by 33
  3. 2024Codebook LLMs: Evaluating LLMs as Measurement Tools for Political Science Conceptscited by 28

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Agent-Enhanced Large Language Models for Researching Political Institutions
  2. 2026PolitNuggets: Benchmarking Agentic Discovery of Long-Tail Political Facts
  3. 2026Can Multi-Agent LLMs Identify Their Peers? Stylometric Fingerprinting in Role-Constrained Political Analysis
  4. 2026Mapping Political-Elite Networks in Europe with a Multilingual Joint Entity-Relation Extraction Pipeline
  5. 2025Large Language Models Require Curated Context for Reliable Political Fact-Checking -- Even with Reasoning and Web Search
  6. 2024GermanPartiesQA: Benchmarking Commercial Large Language Models and AI Companions for Political Alignment and Sycophancy
  7. 2025AIstorian lets AI be a historian: A KG-powered multi-agent system for accurate biography generation
  8. 2026TRACE: Accountable Agentic Retrieval for Source Discovery in Digital Archives