mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Gaussian Process Limit Reveals Structural Benefits of Graph Transformers

arXiv 2603.17569 ↗First posted 18 Mar 2026stat.ML cs.LGcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Graph transformers are the state-of-the-art for learning from graph-structured data and are empirically known to avoid several pitfalls of message-passing architectures. However, there is limited theoretical analysis on why these models perform well in practice. In this work, we prove that attention-based architectures have structural benefits over graph convolutional networks in the context of node-level prediction tasks. Specifically, we study the neural network gaussian process limits of graph transformers (GAT, Graphormer, Specformer) with infinite width and infinite heads, and derive the node-level and edge-level kernels across the layers. Our results characterise how the node features and the graph structure propagate through the graph attention layers. As a specific example, we prove that graph transformers structurally preserve community information and maintain discriminative node representations even in deep layers, thereby preventing oversmoothing. We provide empirical evidence on synthetic and real-world graphs that validate our theoretical insights, such as integrating informative priors and positional encoding can improve performance of deep graph transformers.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 21 of its 27 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 18 Mar 2026.

Builds on

21 of 27 references.

References · 21

  1. 2017Graph Attention Networkscited by 8,854
  2. 2018Deeper Insights into Graph Convolutional Networks for Semi-Supervised Learningcited by 1,099
  3. 2019Heterogeneous Graph Attention Networkcited by 732
  4. 2020On the Bottleneck of Graph Neural Networks and its Practical Implicationscited by 624
  5. 2017Deep Neural Networks as Gaussian Processescited by 617
  6. 2018Gaussian Process Behaviour in Wide Deep Neural Networkscited by 314
  7. 2019Revisiting Graph Neural Networks: All We Have is Low-Pass Filterscited by 260
  8. 2019On the Inductive Bias of Neural Tangent Kernelscited by 177
  9. 2018Bayesian Deep Convolutional Networks with Many Channels are Gaussian Processescited by 164
  10. 2019Scaling Limits of Wide Neural Networks with Weight Sharing: Gaussian Process Behavior, Gradient Independence, and Neural Tangent Kernel Derivationcited by 146
  11. 2021GraphFormers: GNN-nested Transformers for Representation Learning on Textual Graphcited by 143
  12. 2018Deep Convolutional Networks as shallow Gaussian Processescited by 137
9 more
  1. 2020Infinite attention: NNGP and NTK for deep attention networkscited by 117
  2. 2022Not too little, not too much: a theoretical analysis of graph (over)smoothingcited by 106
  3. 2023Specformer: Spectral Graph Neural Networks Meet Transformerscited by 102
  4. 2018GEMSEC: Graph Embedding with Self Clusteringcited by 61
  5. 2022A Non-Asymptotic Analysis of Oversmoothing in Graph Neural Networkscited by 49
  6. 2023Demystifying Oversmoothing in Attention-Based Graph Neural Networkscited by 47
  7. 2024On the Expressive Power of Spectral Invariant Graph Neural Networkscited by 15
  8. 2022Analysis of Convolutions, Non-linearity and Depth in Graph Neural Networks using Neural Tangent Kernelcited by 7
  9. 2023Graph Neural Network-Inspired Kernels for Gaussian Processes in Semi-Supervised Learningcited by 5

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.