mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Evidence for systematic semantic structure in individual letters

arXiv 2603.17306 ↗First posted 18 Mar 2026cs.CL q-bio.NCcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Associations between speech sounds and meaning are well documented but have not been systematically mapped over a whole alphabet. Here we map them across the 26 English letters and find that each carries a structured, multidimensional semantic profile that is recoverable from text, perceived across languages, and predicted by articulatory features. Three large language models independently detected consistent semantic structure across nine perceptual dimensions in 220 pairwise letter contrasts, and the profiles they recovered were then tested in preregistered experiments with 1,388 human participants. Native English readers chose the predicted word above chance (85.3%, selected items; 65.7%, all contrasts), and the preference followed the letter rather than the words that carried it. Listeners of five typologically diverse languages showed the same preference (76.7%, selected pairs; 68.4%, randomly drawn contrasts), regardless of their English proficiency. Articulatory features assigned to each letter predicted both the model profiles and the human judgments. Letter-meaning association is thus a systematic, multidimensional property of the alphabet rather than a set of isolated effects.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 0 of its 6 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 18 Mar 2026.

Builds on

0 of 6 references.

No references here yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.