Self-Regularized Learning Methods
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We introduce a general framework for analyzing learning algorithms based on the notion of self-regularization, which captures implicit complexity control without requiring explicit regularization. This is motivated by previous observations that many algorithms, such as gradient-descent based learning, exhibit implicit regularization. In a nutshell, for a self-regularized algorithm the complexity of the predictor is inherently controlled by that of the simplest comparator achieving the same empirical risk. This framework is sufficiently rich to cover both classical regularized empirical risk minimization and gradient descent. Building on self-regularization, we provide a thorough statistical analysis of such algorithms including minmax-optimal rates, where it suffices to show that the algorithm is self-regularized -- all further requirements stem from the learning problem itself. Finally, we discuss the problem of data-dependent hyperparameter selection, providing a general result which yields minmax-optimal rates up to a double logarithmic factor and covers data-driven early stopping for RKHS-based gradient descent.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 18 of its 42 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 17 Mar 2026.
Builds on
18 of 42 references.
References · 18
- 2016An overview of gradient descent optimization algorithmscited by 1,021
- 2017The Implicit Bias of Gradient Descent on Separable Datacited by 649
- 2019Surprises in High-Dimensional Ridgeless Least Squares Interpolationcited by 508
- 2020Implicit Bias of Gradient Descent for Wide Two-layer Neural Networks Trained with the Logistic Losscited by 267
- 2018Just Interpolate: Kernel "Ridgeless" Regression Can Generalizecited by 190
- 2017Sobolev Norm Learning Rates for Regularized Least-Squares Algorithmcited by 113
- 2013Early stopping and non-parametric regression: An optimal data-dependent stopping rulecited by 86
- 2016Optimal Rates For Regularization Of Statistical Inverse Learning Problemscited by 68
- 2018Optimal Rates for Spectral Algorithms with Least-Squares Regression over Hilbert Spacescited by 59
- 2021Understanding neural networks with reproducing kernel Banach spacescited by 50
- 2017Geometry of Optimization and Implicit Regularization in Deep Learningcited by 39
- 2019On Reproducing Kernel Banach Spaces: Generic Definitions and Unified Framework of Constructionscited by 29
6 more
- 2018Optimal Convergence for Distributed Learning with Stochastic Gradient Methods and Spectral Algorithmscited by 22
- 2015Iterative Regularization for Learning with Convex Loss Functionscited by 9
- 2025Benefits of Early Stopping in Gradient Descent for Overparameterized Logistic Regressioncited by 9
- 2017Learning Rates for Kernel-Based Expectile Regressioncited by 4
- 2021From inexact optimization to learning via gradient concentrationcited by 4
- 2015An SVM-like Approach for Expectile Regressioncited by 3
Built on by
Not cited yet.