mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

GIST: Gauge-Invariant Spectral Transformers for Scalable Graph Neural Operators

arXiv 2603.16849 ↗First posted 17 Mar 2026cs.LGcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Neural operators on irregular meshes face a fundamental tension. Spectral positional encodings, the natural choice for capturing geometry, require cubic-complexity eigendecomposition and inadvertently break gauge invariance through numerical solver artifacts; existing efficient approximations sacrifice gauge symmetry by design. Both failure modes break discretization invariance: models fail to transfer across mesh resolutions of the same domain, and similarly across different graphs of related structure in inductive settings. We propose GIST (Gauge-Invariant Spectral Transformer), a scalable neural operator that resolves this tension by restricting attention to pairwise inner products of efficient approximate spectral embeddings. We prove these inner products estimate an exactly gauge-invariant graph kernel at end-to-end O(N) complexity, and establish a formal connection between gauge invariance and discretization-invariant learning with bounded mismatch error. To our knowledge, GIST is the first scalable graph neural operator with a provable discretization-mismatch bound. Empirically, GIST sets state-of-the-art on the AirfRANS, ShapeNet-Car, DrivAerNet, and DrivAerNet++ mesh benchmarks (up to 750K nodes), and additionally matches strong baselines on standard graph benchmarks (e.g., 99.50% micro-F1 on PPI).

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 66 of its 89 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 17 Mar 2026.

Builds on

66 of 89 references.

References · 66

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
  2. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 29,915
  3. 2016Semi-Supervised Classification with Graph Convolutional Networkscited by 11,282
  4. 2017Graph Attention Networkscited by 8,854
  5. 2017Inductive Representation Learning on Large Graphscited by 6,284
  6. 2023Mamba: Linear-Time Sequence Modeling with Selective State Spacescited by 4,616
  7. 2015ShapeNet: An Information-Rich 3D Model Repositorycited by 2,880
  8. 2020Fourier Neural Operator for Parametric Partial Differential Equationscited by 2,806
  9. 2021Efficiently Modeling Long Sequences with Structured State Spacescited by 2,424
  10. 2019Fast Graph Representation Learning with PyTorch Geometriccited by 2,414
  11. 2020Transformers are RNNs: Fast Autoregressive Transformers with Linear Attentioncited by 1,979
  12. 2019DeepONet: Learning nonlinear operators for identifying differential equations based on the universal approximation theorem of operatorscited by 1,965
38 more
  1. 2021Is Space-Time Attention All You Need for Video Understanding?cited by 1,609
  2. 2020Rethinking Attention with Performerscited by 1,584
  3. 2024Transformers are SSMs: Generalized Models and Efficient Algorithms Through Structured State Space Dualitycited by 1,283
  4. 2018Self-Attention with Relative Position Representationscited by 1,112
  5. 2021Perceiver: General Perception with Iterative Attentioncited by 1,089
  6. 2016Geometric deep learning: going beyond Euclidean datacited by 1,042
  7. 2016Revisiting Semi-Supervised Learning with Graph Embeddingscited by 970
  8. 2020Simple and Deep Graph Convolutional Networkscited by 857
  9. 2021How Attentive are Graph Attention Networks?cited by 818
  10. 2020Neural Operator: Graph Kernel Network for Partial Differential Equationscited by 722
  11. 2022Recipe for a General, Powerful, Scalable Graph Transformercited by 702
  12. 2020A Generalization of Transformer Networks to Graphscited by 653
  13. 2019GraphSAINT: Graph Sampling Based Inductive Learning Methodcited by 618
  14. 2021Perceiver IO: A General Architecture for Structured Inputs & Outputscited by 616
  15. 2021Combining Recurrent, Convolutional, and Continuous-time Models with Linear State-Space Layerscited by 607
  16. 2019Cluster-GCN: An Efficient Algorithm for Training Deep and Large Graph Convolutional Networkscited by 540
  17. 2021Rethinking Graph Transformers with Spectral Attentioncited by 468
  18. 2019Are Transformers universal approximators of sequence-to-sequence functions?cited by 404
  19. 2021Choose a Transformer: Fourier or Galerkincited by 333
  20. 2021Graph Neural Networks with Learnable Structural and Positional Representationscited by 326
  21. 2023GNOT: A General Neural Operator Transformer for Operator Learningcited by 321
  22. 2021Do Transformers Really Perform Bad for Graph Representation?cited by 318
  23. 2024Transolver: A Fast Transformer Solver for PDEs on General Geometriescited by 299
  24. 2023Geometry-Informed Neural Operator for Large-Scale 3D PDEscited by 293
  25. 2022U-NO: U-shaped Neural Operatorscited by 219
  26. 2019Transformer Dissection: A Unified Understanding of Transformer's Attention via the Lens of Kernelcited by 211
  27. 2023Convolutional Neural Operators for robust and accurate learning of PDEscited by 207
  28. 2023NodeFormer: A Scalable Graph Structure Learning Transformer for Node Classificationcited by 207
  29. 2022Pure Transformers are Powerful Graph Learnerscited by 188
  30. 2022Sign and Basis Invariant Networks for Spectral Graph Representation Learningcited by 176
  31. 2023Exphormer: Sparse Transformers for Graphscited by 166
  32. 2018GaAN: Gated Attention Networks for Learning on Large and Spatiotemporal Graphscited by 164
  33. 2019Anti-Money Laundering in Bitcoin: Experimenting with Graph Convolutional Networks for Financial Forensicscited by 158
  34. 2022NAGphormer: A Tokenized Graph Transformer for Node Classification in Large Graphscited by 137
  35. 2023SGFormer: Simplifying and Empowering Transformers for Large-Graph Representationscited by 131
  36. 2023Specformer: Spectral Graph Neural Networks Meet Transformerscited by 102
  37. 2024Classic GNNs are Strong Baselines: Reassessing GNNs for Node Classificationcited by 83
  38. 2022AirfRANS: High Fidelity Computational Fluid Dynamics Dataset for Approximating Reynolds-Averaged Navier-Stokes Solutionscited by 77

50 most cited of 66 All 66 (JSON)

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 3.

3 papers.