mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Trained Persistent Memory for Frozen Encoder--Decoder LLMs: Six Architectural Methods

arXiv 2603.16413 ↗First posted 17 Mar 2026cs.LG cs.AIcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Frozen encoder--decoder language models are stateless: the latent representation is discarded after every forward pass, so no information persists across sessions. This paper presents a proof-of-concept pilot study showing that persistent memory in the continuous latent space of a frozen LLM is feasible -- even under severe resource constraints (a single frozen Flan-T5-XL backbone, small trainable adapters, a single dataset). We implement six architectural methods spanning three injection points and four write mechanisms; unlike text-level memory systems, every write and read is a differentiable operation on dense vectors. After training only the adapter, the memory bank continues to accumulate at inference time without gradients, enabling conversational learning. Under a forgetting-curve evaluation on LoCoMo at two capacity scales (1× and 10×), the stateless baseline scores exactly zero; at 10× all six trained adapters produce positive memory-recall curves; at 1× three methods collapse, revealing capacity as a critical design parameter. Because the memory bank is a compact numerical array, it can be scaled to arbitrarily large capacity without altering the backbone. We argue that full end-to-end training with larger models, larger data, and orders-of-magnitude larger memory will yield substantially stronger results; this pilot study establishes the feasibility baseline and design-space taxonomy that such efforts require.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 11 of its 15 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 17 Mar 2026.

Builds on

11 of 15 references.

References · 11

  1. 2019Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformercited by 14,491
  2. 2022Flamingo: a Visual Language Model for Few-Shot Learningcited by 4,337
  3. 2021Prefix-Tuning: Optimizing Continuous Prompts for Generationcited by 3,878
  4. 2023MemGPT: Towards LLMs as Operating Systemscited by 1,295
  5. 2024Evaluating Very Long-Term Conversational Memory of LLM Agentscited by 800
  6. 2014Neural Turing Machinescited by 630
  7. 2023MemoryBank: Enhancing Large Language Models with Long-Term Memorycited by 539
  8. 2021Linear Transformers Are Secretly Fast Weight Programmerscited by 471
  9. 2021Beyond Goldfish Memory: Long-Term Open-Domain Conversationcited by 266
  10. 2026Inhibitory Cross-Talk Enables Functional Lateralization in Attention-Coupled Latent Memorycited by 3
  11. 2026A Miniature Brain Transformer: Thalamic Gating, Hippocampal Lateralization, Amygdaloid Salience, and Prefrontal Working Memory in Attention-Coupled Latent Memorycited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.

2 papers.