Physics-integrated neural differentiable modeling for immersed boundary systems
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Accurately, efficiently, and stably computing complex fluid flows and their evolution near solid boundaries over long horizons remains challenging. Conventional numerical solvers require fine grids and small time steps to resolve near-wall dynamics, resulting in high computational costs, while purely data-driven surrogate models accumulate rollout errors and lack robustness under extrapolative conditions. To address these issues, this study extends existing neural PDE solvers by developing a physics-integrated differentiable framework for long-horizon prediction of immersed-boundary flows. A key design aspect of the framework includes an important improvement, namely the structural integration of physical principles into an end-to-end differentiable architecture incorporating a PDE-based intermediate velocity module and a multi-direct forcing immersed boundary module, both adhering to the pressure-projection procedure for incompressible flow computation. The computationally expensive pressure projection step is substituted with a learned implicit correction using ConvResNet blocks to reduce cost, and a sub-iteration strategy is introduced to separate the embedded physics module's stability requirement from the surrogate model's time step, enabling stable coarse-grid autoregressive rollouts with large effective time increments. The framework uses only single-step supervision for training, eliminating long-horizon backpropagation and reducing training time to under one hour on a single GPU. Evaluations on benchmark cases of flow past a stationary cylinder and a rotationally oscillating cylinder at Re=100 show the proposed model consistently outperforms purely data-driven, physics-loss-constrained, and coarse-grid numerical baselines in flow-field fidelity and long-horizon stability, while achieving an approximately 200-fold inference speedup over the high-resolution solver.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 14 of its 48 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 17 Mar 2026.
Builds on
14 of 48 references.
References · 14
- 2018Neural Ordinary Differential Equationscited by 3,733
- 2015Automatic differentiation in machine learning: a surveycited by 846
- 2021Characterizing possible failure modes in physics-informed neural networkscited by 632
- 2021Machine learning accelerated computational fluid dynamicscited by 461
- 2019Machine Learning for Fluid Mechanicscited by 380
- 2017PDE-Net: Learning PDEs from Datacited by 304
- 2021Enhancing Computational Fluid Dynamics with Machine Learningcited by 137
- 2016Accelerating Eulerian Fluid Simulation With Convolutional Networkscited by 128
- 2022Accelerated Policy Learning with Parallel Differentiable Simulationcited by 92
- 2022Multi-resolution partial differential equations preserved learning framework for spatiotemporal dynamicscited by 44
- 2023Differentiable hybrid neural modeling for fluid-structure interactioncited by 18
- 2023Identifying regions of importance in wall-bounded turbulence through explainable deep learningcited by 15
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2023PDE-Refiner: Achieving Accurate Long Rollouts with Neural PDE Solvers
- 2025Autoregressive regularized score-based diffusion models for multi-scenarios fluid flow prediction
- 2026Inpainting physics: self-supervised learning for context-driven fluid simulation
- 2025Mixture of neural operator experts for learning boundary conditions and model selection
- 2023Benchmarking Autoregressive Conditional Diffusion Models for Turbulent Flow Simulation
- 2025CFO: Learning Continuous-Time PDE Dynamics via Flow-Matched Neural Operators
- 2026Learning to Discretize: Diffusion-Based Adaptive Mesh with Spectral Guidance
- 2026Oscillatory State-Space Models as Inductive Biases for Physics-Informed Neural PDE Solvers