mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Selective Memory for Artificial Intelligence: Write-Time Gating with Hierarchical Archiving

arXiv 2603.15994 ↗First posted 16 Mar 2026cs.AIcited by 0

On the map: Retrieval-augmented generation → Generation and context integration

Abstract (arXiv)

Retrieval-augmented generation stores all content indiscriminately, degrading accuracy as noise accumulates. Parametric approaches compress knowledge into weights, precluding selective updates. Neither mirrors biological memory, which gates encoding based on salience and archives rather than deletes superseded information. We introduce write-time gating that filters incoming knowledge objects using composite salience scores (source reputation, novelty, reliability) while maintaining version chains that preserve prior states. Using real LLM evaluation without oracle access to quality labels, write gating achieves 100 percent accuracy versus 13 percent for ungated stores. The critical finding emerges under distractor scaling: at 8:1 distractor ratios, read-time filtering (Self-RAG) collapses to 0 percent while write gating maintains 100 percent, revealing a structural advantage of write-time over read-time curation. Validation on Wikipedia (20 entities), procedurally generated pharmacology data, and 2026 arXiv papers confirms these findings. The gating advantage scales inversely with parametric memory support: +25pp for Wikipedia, +48pp for post-cutoff arXiv, +65pp for procedural data with zero training knowledge. Signal ablation confirms the method does not depend on oracle-correlated metadata. Write gating matches Self-RAG accuracy at one-ninth the query-time cost.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Generation and context integration, one of 15 directions in Retrieval-augmented generation. Builds on 8 of its 17 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 Mar 2026.

Builds on

8 of 17 references.

Closest ancestors · 1

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2020Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP Tasks22 May

Other references · 7

  1. 2023Self-RAG: Learning to Retrieve, Generate, and Critique through Self-Reflectioncited by 1,839
  2. 2023MemGPT: Towards LLMs as Operating Systemscited by 1,389
  3. 2014Neural Turing Machinescited by 644
  4. 2020Hopfield Networks is All You Needcited by 475
  5. 2024Titans: Learning to Memorize at Test Timecited by 328
  6. 2017FearNet: Brain-Inspired Model for Incremental Learningcited by 177
  7. 2017Neural Episodic Controlcited by 151

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Memory Depth, Not Memory Access: Selective Parametric Consolidation for Long-Running Language Agents
  2. 2026Diagnosing Retrieval vs. Utilization Bottlenecks in LLM Agent Memory
  3. 2026GAM-RAG: Gain-Adaptive Memory for Evolving Retrieval in Retrieval-Augmented Generation
  4. 2026Beyond Memory Leaderboards: Evaluating Scientific Memory as Budgeted Context Restoration
  5. 2026Selective Memory Retention for Long-Horizon LLM Agents
  6. 2025Retrieval as a Decision: Training-Free Adaptive Gating for Efficient RAG
  7. 2026Less Context, More Accuracy: A Bi-Temporal Memory Engine for LLM Agents Where a Lean Retrieved Context Beats the Full History
  8. 2026CAMeR: Keyword-Gated Hybrid Activation for Adaptive Memory Retention in LLM Agents