Data-efficient Bayesian-guided design selection from large candidate sets: Application to hyperelastic stochastic metamaterials
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
From a pool of admissible designs, we aim to identify a structure that achieves a target macroscopic stress response. For each candidate, the response is obtained from a high-fidelity oracle, such as expensive computational homogenization or experiments. We consider cases in which (i) the geometry cannot be conveniently parameterized, rendering gradient-based optimization inapplicable, and (ii) brute-force evaluation of all candidates is infeasible due to costly oracle queries. To tackle this challenge, we propose a Bayesian-guided design selection framework. The dimensionality of design variants is reduced through statistical feature engineering, and the resulting low-dimensional descriptors are mapped to effective hyperelastic constitutive parameters using a multi-output Gaussian process surrogate. The surrogate is trained using uncertainty-driven active learning with only a limited number of high-fidelity oracle evaluations. The surrogate shortlists promising candidates, and since its accuracy is inherently limited, the final selection of the optimal design is performed through high-fidelity oracle evaluations within the shortlist. In numerical test cases, we consider a design set of 50,000 candidate structures. Active learning requires labeling less than half a percent of the entire candidate set. Bayesian-guided design selection reaches a prescribed error threshold with only a handful of oracle evaluations in most cases.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 18 of its 77 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 Mar 2026.
Builds on
18 of 77 references.
References · 18
- 2013Gaussian Processes for Big Datacited by 377
- 2020Deep Generative Modeling for Mechanistic-based Learning and Design of Metamaterial Systemscited by 51
- 2020Unsupervised discovery of interpretable hyperelastic constitutive lawscited by 51
- 2022A new family of Constitutive Artificial Neural Networks towards automated model discoverycited by 48
- 2023Inverse-design of nonlinear mechanical metamaterials via video denoising diffusion modelscited by 48
- 2023Unifying the design space and optimizing linear and nonlinear truss metamaterials by generative modelingcited by 21
- 2020Microstructure Generation via Generative Adversarial Network for Heterogeneous, Topologically Complex 3D Materialscited by 12
- 2023Microstructure reconstruction of 2D/3D random materials via diffusion-based deep generative modelscited by 9
- 2023Differentiable graph-structured models for inverse design of lattice materialscited by 8
- 2024Inverse design of anisotropic microstructures using physics-augmented neural networkscited by 7
- 2025Deep learning-aided inverse design of porous metamaterialscited by 4
- 2025Automated Constitutive Model Discovery by Pairing Sparse Regression Algorithms with Model Selection Criteriacited by 3
6 more
- 2025Unsupervised Constitutive Model Discovery from Sparse and Noisy Datacited by 3
- 2023On the Identifiability and Interpretability of Gaussian Process Modelscited by 2
- 2024FFT-based surrogate modeling of auxetic metamaterials with real-time prediction of effective elastic properties and swift inverse designcited by 2
- 2019Computational Design of Finite Strain Auxetic Metamaterials via Topology Optimization and Nonlinear Homogenizationcited by 1
- 2025Reduced-order structure-property linkages for stochastic metamaterialscited by 1
- 2025Uncertainty quantification in model discovery by distilling interpretable material constitutive models from Gaussian process posteriorscited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.