The Comprehension-Gated Agent Economy: A Robustness-First Architecture for AI Economic Agency
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
AI agents are increasingly granted economic agency (executing trades, managing budgets, negotiating contracts, and spawning sub-agents), yet current frameworks gate this agency on capability benchmarks that are empirically uncorrelated with operational robustness. We introduce the Comprehension-Gated Agent Economy (CGAE), a formal architecture in which an agent's economic permissions are upper-bounded by a verified comprehension function derived from adversarial robustness audits. The gating mechanism operates over three orthogonal robustness dimensions: constraint compliance (measured by CDCT), epistemic integrity (measured by DDFT), and behavioral alignment (measured by AGT), with intrinsic hallucination rates serving as a cross-cutting diagnostic. We define a weakest-link gate function that maps robustness vectors to discrete economic tiers, and prove three properties of the resulting system: (1) bounded economic exposure, ensuring maximum financial liability is a function of verified robustness; (2) incentive-compatible robustness investment, showing rational agents maximize profit by improving robustness rather than scaling capability alone; and (3) monotonic safety scaling, demonstrating that aggregate system safety does not decrease as the economy grows. The architecture includes temporal decay and stochastic re-auditing mechanisms that prevent post-certification drift. CGAE provides the first formal bridge between empirical AI robustness evaluation and economic governance, transforming safety from a regulatory burden into a competitive advantage.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 10 of its 23 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 27 Feb 2026.
Builds on
10 of 23 references.
References · 10
- 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,971
- 2021Evaluating Large Language Models Trained on Codecited by 8,320
- 2020Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understandingcited by 7,963
- 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,364
- 2017Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attackscited by 6,415
- 2022Constitutional AI: Harmlessness from AI Feedbackcited by 3,050
- 2021TruthfulQA: Measuring How Models Mimic Human Falsehoodscited by 2,975
- 2023AutoGen: Enabling Next-Gen LLM Applications via Multi-Agent Conversationcited by 1,988
- 2016Concrete Problems in AI Safetycited by 1,642
- 2017Deal or No Deal? End-to-End Learning for Negotiation Dialoguescited by 209
Built on by
Not cited yet.