Building Trust in PINNs: Error Estimation through Finite Difference Methods
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) constitute a flexible deep learning approach for solving partial differential equations (PDEs), which model phenomena ranging from heat conduction to quantum mechanical systems. Despite their flexibility, PINNs offer limited insight into how their predictions deviate from the true solution, hindering trust in their prediction quality. We propose a lightweight post-hoc method that addresses this gap by producing pointwise error estimates for PINN predictions, which offer a natural form of explanation for such models, identifying not just whether a prediction is wrong, but where and by how much. For linear partial differential equations, the error between a PINN approximation and the true solution satisfies the same differential operator as the original problem, but driven by the PINN's PDE residual as its source term. We solve this error equation numerically using finite difference methods requiring no knowledge of the true solution. Evaluated on several benchmark PDEs, our method yields accurate error maps at low computational cost, enabling targeted and interpretable validation of PINNs.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 24 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 Mar 2026.
Builds on
17 of 24 references.
References · 17
- 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 37,240
- 2021Characterizing possible failure modes in physics-informed neural networkscited by 643
- 2020When and why PINNs fail to train: A neural tangent kernel perspectivecited by 634
- 2019DeepXDE: A deep learning library for solving differential equationscited by 619
- 2022Scientific Machine Learning through Physics-Informed Neural Networks: Where we are and What's nextcited by 608
- 2020Estimates on the generalization error of Physics Informed Neural Networks (PINNs) for approximating PDEscited by 116
- 2024Challenges in Training PINNs: A Loss Landscape Perspectivecited by 113
- 2022Mitigating Propagation Failures in Physics-informed Neural Networks using Retain-Resample-Release (R3) Samplingcited by 73
- 2024From PINNs to PIKANs: Recent Advances in Physics-Informed Machine Learningcited by 73
- 2022Generic bounds on the approximation error for physics-informed (and) operator learningcited by 65
- 2024Numerical analysis of physics-informed neural networks and related models in physics-informed machine learningcited by 39
- 2022Certified machine learning: A posteriori error estimation for physics-informed neural networkscited by 15
5 more
- 2023Efficient Error Certification for Physics-Informed Neural Networkscited by 10
- 2023Residual-based error bound for physics-informed neural networkscited by 9
- 2022Certified machine learning: Rigorous a posteriori error bounds for PDE defined PINNscited by 8
- 2025Prediction error certification for PINNs: Theory, computation, and application to Stokes flowcited by 4
- 2025Physics-Informed Inference Time Scaling for Solving High-Dimensional PDE via Defect Correctioncited by 2
Built on by
Not cited yet.