In-Context Symbolic Regression for Robustness-Improved Kolmogorov-Arnold Networks
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Symbolic regression aims to replace black-box predictors with concise analytical expressions that can be inspected and validated in scientific machine learning. Kolmogorov-Arnold Networks (KANs) are well suited to this goal because each connection between adjacent units (an "edge") is parametrised by a learnable univariate function that can, in principle, be replaced by a symbolic operator. In practice, however, symbolic extraction is a bottleneck: the standard KAN-to-symbol approach fits operators to each learned edge function in isolation, making the discrete choice sensitive to initialisation and non-convex parameter fitting, and ignoring how local substitutions interact through the full network. We study in-context symbolic regression for operator extraction in KANs, and present two complementary instantiations. Greedy in-context Symbolic Regression (GSR) performs greedy, in-context selection by choosing edge replacements according to end-to-end loss improvement after brief fine-tuning. Gated Matching Pursuit (GMP) amortises this in-context selection by training a differentiable gated operator layer that places an operator library behind sparse gates on each edge; after convergence, gates are discretised (optionally followed by a short in-context greedy refinement pass). We quantify robustness via one-factor-at-a-time (OFAT) hyper-parameter sweeps and assess both predictive error and qualitative consistency of recovered formulas. Across several experiments, greedy in-context symbolic regression achieves up to 99.8% reduction in median OFAT test MSE.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 30 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 Mar 2026.
Builds on
17 of 30 references.
References · 17
- 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,555
- 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,070
- 2017Outrageously Large Neural Networks: The Sparsely-Gated Mixture-of-Experts Layercited by 3,509
- 2016Categorical Reparameterization with Gumbel-Softmaxcited by 2,739
- 2017Towards A Rigorous Science of Interpretable Machine Learningcited by 1,416
- 2018Sanity Checks for Saliency Mapscited by 1,156
- 2016The Concrete Distribution: A Continuous Relaxation of Discrete Random Variablescited by 1,148
- 2024KAN: Kolmogorov-Arnold Networkscited by 649
- 2017Learning Sparse Neural Networks through L0 Regularizationcited by 583
- 2017Interpretation of Neural Networks is Fragilecited by 444
- 2018On the Robustness of Interpretability Methodscited by 314
- 2021Contemporary Symbolic Regression Methods and their Relative Performancecited by 215
5 more
- 2020AI Feynman 2.0: Pareto-optimal symbolic regression exploiting graph modularitycited by 144
- 2024Kolmogorov-Arnold Networks are Radial Basis Function Networkscited by 128
- 2024KAN 2.0: Kolmogorov-Arnold Networks Meet Sciencecited by 118
- 2024rKAN: Rational Kolmogorov-Arnold Networkscited by 35
- 2024FC-KAN: Function Combinations in Kolmogorov-Arnold Networkscited by 19
Built on by
Not cited yet.