mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

FairMed-XGB: A Bayesian-Optimised Multi-Metric Framework with Explainability for Demographic Equity in Critical Healthcare Data

arXiv 2603.14947 ↗First posted 16 Mar 2026cs.LG cs.AIcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Machine learning models deployed in critical care settings exhibit demographic biases, particularly gender disparities, that undermine clinical trust and equitable treatment. This paper introduces FairMed-XGB, a novel framework that systematically detects and mitigates gender-based prediction bias while preserving model performance and transparency. The framework integrates a fairness-aware loss function combining Statistical Parity Difference, Theil Index, and Wasserstein Distance, jointly optimised via Bayesian Search into an XGBoost classifier. Post-mitigation evaluation on seven clinically distinct cohorts derived from the MIMIC-IV-ED and eICU databases demonstrates substantial bias reduction: Statistical Parity Difference decreases by 40 to 51 percent on MIMIC-IV-ED and 10 to 19 percent on eICU; Theil Index collapses by four to five orders of magnitude to near-zero values; Wasserstein Distance is reduced by 20 to 72 percent. These gains are achieved with negligible degradation in predictive accuracy (AUC-ROC drop <0.02). SHAP-based explainability reveals that the framework diminishes reliance on gender-proxy features, providing clinicians with actionable insights into how and where bias is corrected. FairMed-XGB offers a robust, interpretable, and ethically aligned solution for equitable clinical decision-making, paving the way for trustworthy deployment of AI in high-stakes healthcare environments.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 10 of its 42 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 Mar 2026.

Builds on

10 of 42 references.

References · 10

  1. 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,555
  2. 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,070
  3. 2018Mitigating Unwanted Biases with Adversarial Learningcited by 663
  4. 2019Explaining Machine Learning Classifiers through Diverse Counterfactual Explanationscited by 614
  5. 2021Counterfactual Invariance to Spurious Correlations: Why and How to Pass Stress Testscited by 77
  6. 2020Towards Accuracy-Fairness Paradox: Adversarial Example-based Data Augmentation for Visual Debiasingcited by 32
  7. 2022Learning Optimal Fair Classification Trees: Trade-offs Between Interpretability, Fairness, and Accuracycited by 15
  8. 2021Normalized multivariate time series causality analysis and causal graph reconstructioncited by 7
  9. 2025A Design Framework for operationalizing Trustworthy Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare: Requirements, Tradeoffs and Challenges for its Clinical Adoptioncited by 3
  10. 2024Evaluating Fairness in Transaction Fraud Models: Fairness Metrics, Bias Audits, and Challengescited by 2

Built on by

Not cited yet.