A Loss Landscape Visualization Framework for Interpreting Reinforcement Learning: An ADHDP Case Study
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Reinforcement learning algorithms have been widely used in dynamic and control systems. However, interpreting their internal learning behavior remains a challenge. In the authors' previous work, a critic match loss landscape visualization method was proposed to study critic training. This study extends that method into a framework which provides a multi-perspective view of the learning dynamics, clarifying how value estimation, policy optimization, and temporal-difference (TD) signals interact during training. The proposed framework includes four complementary components; a three-dimensional reconstruction of the critic match loss surface that shows how TD targets shape the optimization geometry; an actor loss landscape under a frozen critic that reveals how the policy exploits that geometry; a trajectory combining time, Bellman error, and policy weights that indicates how updates move across the surface; and a state-TD map that identifies the state regions that drive those updates. The Action-Dependent Heuristic Dynamic Programming (ADHDP) algorithm for spacecraft attitude control is used as a case study. The framework is applied to compare several ADHDP variants and shows how training stabilizers and target updates change the optimization landscape and affect learning stability. Therefore, the proposed framework provides a systematic and interpretable tool for analyzing reinforcement learning behavior across algorithmic designs.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 7 of its 18 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 15 Mar 2026.
Builds on
7 of 18 references.
References · 7
- 2018Addressing Function Approximation Error in Actor-Critic Methodscited by 2,302
- 2017Visualizing the Loss Landscape of Neural Netscited by 1,126
- 2017Deep Reinforcement Learning that Matterscited by 727
- 2017Sim-to-Real Transfer of Robotic Control with Dynamics Randomizationcited by 616
- 2018Assessing Generalization in Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 132
- 2021A Survey on Interpretable Reinforcement Learningcited by 70
- 2024Koopman-Assisted Reinforcement Learningcited by 11
Built on by
Not cited yet.