mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Demand-Driven Context: A Methodology for Building Enterprise Knowledge Bases Through Agent Failure

arXiv 2603.14057 ↗First posted 14 Mar 2026cs.AIcited by 0

On the map: LLM reasoning → Reasoning for agents, planning and code

also in 1 more
Abstract (arXiv)

Large language model agents demonstrate expert-level reasoning, yet consistently fail on enterprise-specific tasks due to missing domain knowledge -- terminology, operational procedures, system interdependencies, and institutional decisions that exist largely as tribal knowledge. Current approaches fall into two categories: top-down knowledge engineering, which documents domain knowledge before agents use it, and bottom-up automation, where agents learn from task experience. Both have fundamental limitations: top-down efforts produce bloated, untested knowledge bases; bottom-up approaches cannot acquire knowledge that exists only in human heads. We present Demand-Driven Context (DDC), a problem-first methodology that uses agent failure as the primary signal for what domain knowledge to curate. Inspired by Test-Driven Development, DDC inverts knowledge engineering: instead of curating knowledge and hoping it is useful, DDC gives agents real problems, lets them demand the context they need, and curates only the minimum knowledge required to succeed. We describe the methodology, its entity meta-model, and a convergence hypothesis suggesting that 20-30 problem cycles produce a knowledge base sufficient for a given domain role. We demonstrate DDC through a worked example in retail order fulfillment, where nine cycles targeting an SRE incident management agent produce a reusable knowledge base of 46 entities. Finally, we propose a scaling architecture for enterprise adoption with semi-automated curation and human governance.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Reasoning for agents, planning and code, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 6 of its 11 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 Mar 2026.

Builds on

6 of 11 references.

References · 6

  1. 2020Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP Taskscited by 9,297
  2. 2023Reflexion: Language Agents with Verbal Reinforcement Learningcited by 4,276
  3. 2023ExpeL: LLM Agents Are Experiential Learnerscited by 876
  4. 2025Agentic Context Engineering: Evolving Contexts for Self-Improving Language Modelscited by 398
  5. 2025Towards Enterprise-Ready Computer Using Generalist Agentcited by 31
  6. 2025Agent-in-the-Loop: A Data Flywheel for Continuous Improvement in LLM-based Customer Supportcited by 10

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Knowledge Activation: AI Skills as the Institutional Knowledge Primitive for Agentic Software Development
  2. 2026The Agentic Company OS: Substrate Inversion for Sustained Enterprise Agent Deployment
  3. 2026Nurture-First Agent Development: Building Domain-Expert AI Agents Through Conversational Knowledge Crystallization
  4. 2026τ-Knowledge: Evaluating Conversational Agents over Unstructured Knowledge
  5. 2026Context Kubernetes: Declarative Orchestration of Enterprise Knowledge for Agentic AI Systems
  6. 2026Agentic Context Management: Solving Agent Memory and Cost by Treating Them as Lifecycle and Architecture Problems
  7. 2026Distilling Agentic Systems: A Roadmap across Models, Artifacts, and Harnesses
  8. 2026Forage V2: Knowledge Evolution and Transfer in Autonomous Agent Organizations